[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Speed Question...
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Speed Question... |
Date: |
17 Nov 1999 08:41:11 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.4 |
>>>>> "DS" == Darren Schreiber <address@hidden> writes:
DS> Does the creation and dropping of an index for each agent consume
DS> more time than is gained by not using atOffset? Recall that this
DS> will involve the creation and dropping of 50,000 indexes since
DS> each agent will be comparing a unique list.
For short lists, it may well be the case that re-creating an index is
slower. If at all possible, you'd really win if you could preallocate
a C array as an ivar. There's neither cost if you can offset into
a C array.
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- Maps and LispArchiver, Benedikt Stefansson, 1999/11/16
- Re: Maps and LispArchiver, Benedikt Stefansson, 1999/11/16
- Speed Question..., Darren Schreiber, 1999/11/17
- Re: Speed Question..., Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/11/17
- Re: Speed Question..., Darren Schreiber, 1999/11/17
- Re: Speed Question...,
Marcus G. Daniels <=
- Re: Speed Question..., Darren Schreiber, 1999/11/17
- Re: Speed Question..., jalex, 1999/11/17
- Re: Speed Question..., Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/11/17