[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
java layer performance comparisions
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
java layer performance comparisions |
Date: |
16 Dec 1999 22:04:19 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.4 |
[for "javaswarm StartHeatbugs -b" (250 iterations)]
Debian 2.2, AMD-K6 3D 444 MHz, 160MB (884 Bogomips)
Kaffe 1.0b4, Swarm 2.0.1 70 secs
Sun JDK 1.2.2, Swarm 1999-12-16 36 secs
Kaffe 1.0b4, Swarm 1999-12-16 28 secs
Solaris 7, UltraSparc 5 333 MHz, 128MB (662 Bogomips)
Kaffe 1.0b4, Swarm 2.0.1 63 secs
Kaffe 1.0b4, Swarm 1999-12-16 43 secs
Kaffe 1.0.5, Swarm 1999-12-16 33 secs
Objective C Heatbugs, Swarm 2.0.1 13 secs
Redhat 6.1, Sparc 10 RT620X4, 64MB (55 Bogomips, per)
Kaffe 1.0.5, Swarm 1999-12-16 318 secs
Redhat 6.1, Pentium MMX 200 MHz, 64MB (399 Bogomips)
Kaffe 1.0.5, Swarm 2.0.1 115 secs
Kaffe 1.0.5, Swarm 1999-12-16 50 secs
Windows 98, Pentium II 400 MHz, 128MB
JDK 1.2.2, Swarm 2.0.1 35 secs
JDK 1.2.2, Swarm 1999-12-16 16 secs
Objective C heatbugs, Swarm 2.0.1 9 secs
These performance improvements are a result of caching
Java method implementations for Actions, and from
tightening up the multilanguage object directory routines.
Further work: no real effort has been made to generate fast JNI stubs,
and we haven't yet looked at building Swarm models with a native code
compiler like gcj (http://sourceware.cygnus.com/java).
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- java layer performance comparisions,
Marcus G. Daniels <=