Re: [Swftools-common] wrong positioning

[Chris Pugh]

I've part of the reply to this Off-Llist, since it does not relate to
swf-tools!

As to the code, I'm sorry you did quite get was I was attempting to demontrate,
in my own clumsy way.  I'll have to try again, becasue to some extent I think we
are actiually talking at cross-purposes.

 Watch this space... ;o)

Regards,


Chris.

2009/11/7 Pablo Rodríguez <address@hidden>:
> Chris,
>
> Chris Pugh wrote:
>> Pablo,
>>
>> 2009/11/1 Pablo Rodríguez <address@hidden>:
>>> Chris Pugh wrote:
>>>> I didn't say you had done anything 'wrong' in particular.   Simply
>>>> guilty of having a very tic moment!  ;o)
>>> ic' = tongue in che
>>> Chris, I apologize for being rude in my previous reply (I'm afraid I
>>> don't understand what a 'tic moment' might be).
>>
>> Thank you.  However, you have nothing to apologise for.  In fact, it was
>> I who was apologising to you.
>>
>>    tic = tongue in cheek
>>    tfic = tongue firmly in cheek
>>
>> are two somethings I am prone to ( and also guilty of ) more than I care to
>> mention.  tic comments often get misunderstood, even with the emoticons,
>> i.e. ;o), in place, and thus win me a lot of 'enemies'!  ;o)
>>
>> Anyway,
>>
>>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue-in-cheek
>>
>> for a somewhat lengthy explanation!
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> Thanks for the explanation, I didn't know about tongue-in-cheek.
>
>>>> That said,  we see things quite differently,  as do most programmers (
>>>> not that I consider myself to be one that is )).  Thus I'm glad to see you
>>>> have finally lost that excess code!
>>
>>> All my questions to the list are out of my ignorance. I ask because I
>>> don't know. I realized my error after having asked to the list (and
>>> thinking what could have gone wrong). At first, I thought that the issue
>>> was a different one that I had described before.
>>
>> If I were to say 'Ignorance is not one of your best assets, Pablo'  I'd be 
>> being
>> subtly 'tfic' again!  Maybe you will understand me this time?
>
> I understand that your comment is meant somehow ironically. My mistake
> was to take those comments seriously.
>
> Following in next replies,
>
>
> Pablo
>
>
>