swftools-common
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Swftools-common] SwfTool Install - CentOS5.4 - "no way to define 6


From: Kevin Callahan
Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] SwfTool Install - CentOS5.4 - "no way to define 64 bit integer" problem
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:37:35 -0600

I did a build from the src ... worked fine although I had to change some paths in the Makefile and the make test failed with some of the cmps.

The paths I changed where the following tests:

 ./djpeg -dct int -ppm -outfile testout.ppm  testorig.jpg

to

 djpeg -dct int -ppm -outfile testout.ppm  testorig.jpg

etc.

The make and make install didn’t result in any errors and

address@hidden opt]# pdf2swf -V
pdf2swf - part of swftools 0.9.0

Thanks for all your help!

-Kevin

>       ./djpeg -dct int -ppm -outfile testout.ppm  testorig.jpg
>       ./djpeg -dct int -bmp -colors 256 -outfile testout.bmp  testorig.jpg
>       ./cjpeg -dct int -outfile testout.jpg  testimg.ppm
>       ./djpeg -dct int -ppm -outfile testoutp.ppm testprog.jpg
>       ./cjpeg -dct int -progressive -opt -outfile testoutp.jpg testimg.ppm
>       ./jpegtran -outfile testoutt.jpg testprog.jpg
>       cmp testimg.ppm testout.ppm
>       cmp testimg.bmp testout.bmp
>       cmp testimg.jpg testout.jpg
>       cmp testimg.ppm testoutp.ppm
>       cmp testimgp.jpg testoutp.jpg
>       cmp testorig.jpg testoutt.jpg



On 12/7/09 5:07 PM, "Ricardo Pedroso" <address@hidden> wrote:

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Kevin Callahan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.  I verified that I do have libjpeg.  To ensure
> that it wasn’t corrupt I reinstalled it using yum.
>
> Removed:
>   libjpeg.i386 0:6b-37
>
>
> Installed:
>   libjpeg.i386 0:6b-37
>
> Question: is libjpeg 7 required? does 6b37 work with it?
>

I compiled swftools 0.9.0 in CentOS 5 (32bits) without any problems
using the stock jpeglib6
It's weird that in your system it's asking for libjpeg7.
Do you have libjpeg-devel installed to? (yum install libjpeg-devel)

Sorry but I don't know what else can be.
One think you can do is install a clean CentOS system, for example, in a virtual
machine and see if the problem persists.

Here is some specs of my CentOS testing server and pdf2swf:

The only think I have to compile from source was lame(instaled on /usr/local)

address@hidden install]# ldd swftools-0.9.0/src/pdf2swf
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00748000)
        libmp3lame.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libmp3lame.so.0 (0x00e73000)
        libungif.so.4 => /usr/lib/libungif.so.4 (0x004a9000)
        libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x004bb000)
        libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x00a7b000)
        libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x00416000)
        libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00329000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00a52000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00b64000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x008ec000)
        libgif.so.4 => /usr/lib/libgif.so.4 (0x00a39000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x008ce000)
        libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00224000)
        libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x00b24000)
        libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x00b1c000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00a33000)

address@hidden install]# uname -a
Linux srv4 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 30 12:55:19 EDT 2009 i686
athlon i386 GNU/Linux

address@hidden install]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.4 (Final)


> Is there a stable RPM package for centos5.4 (i386) for this?
>

For libjpeg7 I think not, at least on official repos.


Ricardo


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]