Re: [Swftools-common] an unexpected behavior with swfc compiler

[Chris]

Yes you can.  All the commands you enter still occur at the same
specified frame.  It just means that you have to be more specific
by entering an extra line.

There is no difference between what you have written, and this:

## script start.
##
.flash filename="tmp2.swf" version=5 fps=16  bbox=440x200 background=#5f2826
.frame 1
.outline L1_outline:
   M 50 58 L 129 130
.end
.filled L1  outline=L1_outline color=#ffff00 fill=#ffff00
.put L1 x=89 y=94 alpha=100% pin=center rotate=0
.frame 35
.move L1 289 94
.change L1 rotate=0
.frame 70
.move L1 397 38
.change L1 rotate=-31
.end # End swf movie

### Script end.

HTH.

Regards,



Chris.

>On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:37:08 +0100
>luc luc <address@hidden> wrote:

> yes, but with .move command, I can't combine a command like this example 
> (tween of movement AND rotation simultaneoulsy) :
> 
> flash filename="/tmp/ella-temp.swf" version=5 fps=16  bbox=440x200
> background="#5f2826"
> .frame 1
> .outline L1_outline:
> M 50 58 L 129 130
> .end
> .filled L1  outline=L1_outline color=#ffff00 fill=#ffff00
> .put L1 x=89 y=94 alpha=100% pin=center rotate=0
> .frame 35
> .change L1 289 94 rotate=0
> .frame 70
> .change L1 397 38 rotate=-31
> .end # End swf movie
> 
> 
> 
> 2010/12/21 Chris <address@hidden>
> 
> > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:43:50 +0100
> > luc luc <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello ; I'm surprised with the flash obtained with those instructions :
> > >
> > > .flash filename="/tmp/ella-temp.swf" version=5 fps=12  bbox=550x440
> > > background="#ffffff"
> > > .frame 1
> > > .box R1 210 91 color=#000000 fill=#fd0000
> > > .put R1 234 151 alpha=100% pin=center
> > > .frame 50
> > > .change R1 pin=center 378 143
> > > .frame 99
> > > .change R1 pin=center 175 114  rotate=-316
> > > .end # End swf movie
> > >
> > > the box rotation starts at frame #1, not at fram #50 or frame
> > > #99. Someone can help ?
> >
> > The 'change' is always post-stated, and tweens from the previously
> > stated frame.  If you were to implement a change actually at frame
> > #99, just where exactly would you expect it to end?  Now that.. *would* be
> > the surprise! ;o)
> >
> > HTH.
> >
> > Incidentally, remember the current swfc compiler warning - .change
> > has been deprecated in favour of .move
> >
> >
> > Chris
> > --
> > <address@hidden>
> >


-- 
Chris <address@hidden>