[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 2004 23:29:27 +0200 (CEST) |
On Sun, 23 May 2004, David MENTRE wrote:
> Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden> writes:
> > Since Scheme mostly seems to be a strict part of OCaml (am I right?),
> I can't say. I don't know Scheme enough.
And I do not know OCaml enough...
> > would it not be possible to syntactically rewrite Scheme programs into
> > OCaml programs (apart from call/cc). WHat do I miss?
>
> I'm not sure for syntactical rewriting. I always fear corner minor
> issues that make such translation hard in practice (e.g. mutability of
> strings, handling of numerical issues, ...).
We do not use these kind of fancy issues anyway.
> To have a strong answer, we would need to do a side-by-side comparison,
> but I won't do it tonight. :)
Tomorrow night?
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, (continued)
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David MENTRE, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David MENTRE, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David MENTRE, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David Allouche, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] First results on Schemes, Lisps & others, David MENTRE, 2004/05/23