[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior (was: Re: Boehm-gc-texmac
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior (was: Re: Boehm-gc-texmacs cache behavior) |
Date: |
Tue, 25 May 2004 10:00:55 +0200 (CEST) |
On Tue, 25 May 2004, David Allouche wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
> > By the way, it seems that there is a bug in the memory allocation
> > system for recent TeXmacs releases (I did not test for more than a year).
> > The allocated amount of memory strictly increases if I kill the buffer
> > and regenerate the documentation several times (or update the buffer
> > several times). If someone could track that bug down (one may start
> > by identifying in which version this bug occurs for the first time)...
>
> This problem already occured in the version on which the libgc work is
> based. It has probably been here for a very long time.
I checked it for version 1.0.3 and it is there.
I wonder which change introduced this bug.
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior, (continued)
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior, David MENTRE, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior, David Allouche, 2004/05/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior, David MENTRE, 2004/05/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/05/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior (was: Re: Boehm-gc-texmacs cache behavior), David Allouche, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs gc behavior (was: Re: Boehm-gc-texmacs cache behavior),
Joris van der Hoeven <=
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Boehm-gc-texmacs cache behavior, David Allouche, 2004/05/24