Re: [Texmacs-dev] Could this be interesting for TeXmacs?

[David Allouche]

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:52, Alvaro Tejero Cantero <address@hidden> wrote:

>>> http://code.google.com/apis/v8/intro.html
>
> I cannot see how this is relevant at all to TeXmacs.
>

(snip)

> It would be more sensible to port TeXmacs to another scripting language.
> This would avoid a dramatic increase in the overall complexity of the
> system.

You said it.

I do not believe that porting TeXmacs to another scripting language would be a good idea on its own. It beats adding language-to-scheme converters, but only in the way that "questionable" beats "misguided".