[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:48:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:26:31PM +0200, Andrea Gamba wrote:
> Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
> >
> >I don't know what other bash-specific features are used in these
> >scripts. Probably, there are some, because there is some breakage on
> >ubuntu. Ubuntu users can investigate what scripts (and what lines in
> >them) don't work in the expected way.
> >
> This is a third possible solution: to fix the plugins one-by-one for
> compatibility with dash. It is going to take some time however. And if a
> solution is not found for some plugin, I think that the /bin/sh ->
> /bin/bash change should be considered as a compromise.
This compromise is known to fail on several architectures,
so it is best to make our scripts "all-shell-compatible".
What exactly do we use which is not supported by dash?
Best wishes, Joris
- [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu, (continued)
- [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu, Andrea Gamba, 2009/04/22
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu, Joris van der Hoeven, 2009/04/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu, Andrey G. Grozin, 2009/04/26
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu, Joris van der Hoeven, 2009/04/26
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu, David Allouche, 2009/04/27
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu, Joris van der Hoeven, 2009/04/27
- [Texmacs-dev] Octave plugin, Andrea Gamba, 2009/04/27
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Octave plugin, Joris van der Hoeven, 2009/04/27
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Octave plugin, Andrea Gamba, 2009/04/27
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu, Andrea Gamba, 2009/04/27
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] /bin/sh vs. /bin/bash in Ubuntu,
Joris van der Hoeven <=