[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tiger-devel] [RFC] Diferences between 'empty and set' and 'unset' v
From: |
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña |
Subject: |
Re: [Tiger-devel] [RFC] Diferences between 'empty and set' and 'unset' variables |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:54:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:53:50PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > However, this does not work for me, scripts executing haveallvars do not
> > run because of these changes. I have changed the code (and readded the val
> > statement). Changes are in CVS, please take a look at them.
>
> Thank you for all the time you passed on this. But if you think it's a
> non issue (which is probably the case), don't loose your time on this.
>
Well, I do believe it's an issue, I haven't thought of it, but it makes the
haveallvars implementation better after all.
> I've tested the last CVS revision, but it did not worked as I expected:
(...)
It turns out that I tested this in bash but did not test the script itself
after commiting the change.
> Using eval solved it:
(...)
> Here are the results of this version (a patch is attached):
I've applied the patch, thank you very much.
Javi
pgp2m8UrZU3aj.pgp
Description: PGP signature