[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Tinycc-devel] License
From: |
TK |
Subject: |
RE: [Tinycc-devel] License |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:37:34 -0700 |
Fabrice,
I would favor the LGPL as well.
TK
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Fabrice Bellard
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:57 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] License
Hi,
Maybe it would be simpler to just use the internal stack based code
generation API of tcc.
About the licensing, I would be ready to change the license provided
good contributions are made to TinyCC. LGPL would be perfect for me.
Fabrice.
brian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been looking at tinycc for dynamic code generation, and am
> considering adding an AST front-end, which would make this easier.
> Unfortunately we build a distributable commercial product, and cannot
> use code with the GPL license in it.
>
> Either the LGPL or X11 license would suit, and naturally, under either
> circumstance, any modifications or code particular to tinycc would be
> returned to the community.
>
> Are there any active movements in this direction, and if so, what kind
> of timeline do you see on such a relicencing?
>
> Regards,,
>
> Brian
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel