[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast)
From: |
Rob Landley |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast) |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2007 21:36:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Friday 11 May 2007 3:01 pm, Dave Dodge wrote:
> Aside: from a purely C standpoint the memcpy() solution isn't actually
> guaranteed to work either, thanks to C99's concept of padding bits. I
> don't know of any real hardware where it would actually break, though,
> and if such a system does exist it's almost certainly some weird
> DSP/ASIC where if you're writing code for it you already know about
> these issues.
What are "padding bits"?
I strongly suspect this isn't something Linux has to worry about...
Rob
- [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Gil Dabah, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), kf, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), David A. Wheeler, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Gil Dabah, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Dave Dodge, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), kf, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Gil Dabah, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), David A. Wheeler, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Dave Dodge, 2007/05/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast),
Rob Landley <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Dave Dodge, 2007/05/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Rob Landley, 2007/05/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Rob Landley, 2007/05/11
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug Report (offset+cast), Rob Landley, 2007/05/11