[Tinycc-devel] Using clang

[grischka]

You wrote:
> fixed pasto in in 108b2876; background for the additional $CC test is:
> GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc (but i.e. clang, which (as
> of 3.1) requires an addtional CFLAG to accept the non portable (gnuisms all
> over the place; try to cimpile tcc with Sun^HOracle, Intel, Pathscale, ...
> compiler) code).

Using "-fheinous-gnu-extensions" for clang makes sense but I still
don't see how "GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc"???

Thanks,

--- grischka