Re: [Vrs-development] Cluster Management Message (was CVS)

[Bill Lance]

--- Chris Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
> I quite like this idea - though I'm not sure how
> well it really does fit into 
> the architecture... I'll do some more work on this.
> 

I'm not clear about the nature of the doman problem,
no doubt due to ignorance of Goldwater. In a VRS
Cluster, I had thought it was simply a matter of
maitaining a list of active node IP's in the Cluster
Image.  What am I missing?
  

> This does mean resurrecting Phoenix (no pun
> intended!) for the network comms 
> (far more efficient than something like Apache) -
> but we did say that we'd 
> like to use a tight binary format, which precludes
> using port 80 anyway.
> 

I presume you are talking about cluster management
traffic, and not net services traffic.  Perhaps
Phoenix is the core of the Network Port Manager.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com