Re: [GNU-traductores] gpl-faq con alguna corrección

[Xavier Reina]

On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 14:04 +0100, Javier Fdez. Retenaga wrote:
> El Miércoles, 28 de Diciembre de 2005 22:14, escribió:
> > 
> > <file:///home/enrique/Desktop/gpl-faq.es.html#RequiredToClaimCopyri
> >ght> Javier,
> >
> > Primero felicidades por esta estupenda traducción.
> > A ver, he ido corrigiendo según lo leia y aquí están las cosas que
> > he encontrado. Son poquitas eso sí, aunque no he he hecho una
> > comparación el el original más que para los casos en que tenía
> > dudas:
> >

Quería comentar que se han hecho cambios en la versión inglesa de la
página, los cambios son los que pongo más abajo.

Si alguien lo puede actualizar...

Gracias

> <     <li><a href="#WMS" name="TOCWMS">What license should I use for website 
> maintenance system templates?</a></li>
> ---
> >
> 335,338d333
> <
> <     <li><a href="#ClickThrough" name="TOCClickThrough"> Can software
> <     installers ask people to click to agree to the GPL?  If I get some
> <     software under the GPL, do I have to agree to anything?</a></li>
> 2065,2112d2059
> < <dt><b><a href="#TOCWMS" name="WMS">
> < I am writing a website maintenance system</a> (called a "<a
> < href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html";>content
> < management system</a>" by some), or some other application which
> < generates web pages from templates.  What license should I use for
> < those templates?</b></dt>
> <
> < <dd>
> < <p>Templates are minor enough that it is not worth using copyleft to
> < protect them.  It is normally harmless to use copyleft on minor works,
> < but templates are a special case, because they are combined with data
> < provided by users of the application and the combination is
> < distributed.  So, we recommend that you license your templates under
> < simple permissive terms. </p>
> <
> < <p>Some templates make calls into Javascript functions.  Since
> < Javascript is often non-trivial, it is worth copylefting.  Because the
> < templates will be combined with user data, it's possible that
> < template+user data+Javascript would be considered one work under
> < copyright law.  A line needs to be drawn between the Javascript
> < (copylefted), and the user code
> < (usually under incompatible terms). </p>
> <
> < <p><a href="template-diagram.png"><img src="template-diagram.png" alt="A 
> diagram of the above content"></a></p>
> <
> < <p>Here's an exception for Javascript code that does this:</p>
> <
> < <blockquote><p>The copyright holders grant permission to treat any
> < HTML file which merely makes function calls to this code, and for that
> < purpose includes it by reference as a separate work for copyright law
> < purposes</p>
> <
> < <p>As a special exception to GPL, any HTML file which merely makes
> < function calls to this code, and for that purpose includes it by
> < reference shall be deemed a separate work for copyright law purposes.
> < In addition, the copyright holders of this code give you permission to
> < combine this code with free software libraries that are released under
> < the GNU LGPL.  You may copy and distribute such a system following the
> < terms of the GNU GPL for this code and the LGPL for the libraries.  If
> < you modify this code, you may extend this exception to your version of
> < the code, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do
> < so, delete this exception statement from your version.
> < </p></blockquote>
> <
> < </dd>
> <
> <
> <
> 2338,2357d2284
> < <dt><b><a href="#TOCClickThrough"> Can software installers ask people
> <   to click to agree to the GPL?  If I get some software under the GPL,
> <   do I have to agree to anything?</a></b></dt>
> < <dd>
> < <p>
> < Some software packaging systems have a place which requires you to
> < click through or otherwise indicate assent to the terms of the GPL.
> < This is neither required nor forbidden.  With or without a click
> < through, the GPL's rules remain the same. </p>
> <
> < <p>
> < Merely agreeing to the GPL doesn't place any obligations on you.  You
> < are not required to agree to anything to merely use software which is
> < licensed under the GPL. You only have obligations if you modify or
> < distribute the software.  If it really bothers you to click through
> < the GPL, nothing stops you from hacking the software to bypass this.
> < </p>
> < </dd>

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part