[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition
From: |
Tim Mann |
Subject: |
Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:50:01 -0800 |
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:28:56 +0100, Daniel Mehrmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> No, sorry. I think you don't understand how windows language support
> really works. We don't need gettext. Gettext is unix. I don't wanna unix
> ~ stuff into a real native WIN32 application.
Daniel, how do you propose to internationalize backend.c and the other
shared code using Windows language support without breaking their use in
xboard?
I don't know if gettext is as portable across Windows and Unix as we'd
like, but the Windows language support is not portable at all -- it is
Windows-only.
A quick web search for [gettext windows] finds several pages about using
gettext with Win32:
http://home.a-city.de/franco.bez/gettext/gettext_win32_en.html
http://gettext.sourceforge.net/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwrep/
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-app-devel-list/2004-January/msg00160.html
--
Tim Mann address@hidden http://tim-mann.org/
- [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, Carl Simard, 2004/02/18
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, A. Alper ATICI, 2004/02/18
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, Daniel Mehrmann, 2004/02/19
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, A. Alper ATICI, 2004/02/19
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, Tim Mann, 2004/02/19
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, A. Alper ATICI, 2004/02/19
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, Tim Mann, 2004/02/19
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, A. Alper ATICI, 2004/02/20
- Re: [XBoard-devel] Internationalization proposition, Daniel Mehrmann, 2004/02/20