[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xlog-discussion] xlog slow response
From: |
Ben Coleman NJ8J |
Subject: |
Re: [Xlog-discussion] xlog slow response |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:55:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> Using a large log with 25000 QSO's will only work with
> database based logging programs. There are couple linux
> logbook programs that work this was, but I think there are
> more benefits to using text based logs.
Of course, you can combine the two. I keep the majority of my log in a
PostgreSQL database, for which I have written a few command-line
utilties. I use XLog for day-to-day logging (and tlf for contesting),
and periodically export to ADIF and import into my database. Other
utilities hand LOTW export and import, callsign lookups, and marking
QSLs sent and received. I suppose someday I should add a GUI to it, but
for now, this works.
Ben
- --
Ben Coleman address@hidden
"I love the way Microsoft follows standards. In much the
same manner that fish follow migrating caribou."
Paul Tomblin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkuuVLsACgkQRgRgmxNburQA7wCfar/LAbt7Ey8nD/DzP/VIowCe
JSwAni5IVNwfIQVQ/zLOtbImB6HyQbCg
=9YP/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Xlog-discussion] xlog slow response,
Ben Coleman NJ8J <=