Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

classpath (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue Nov 27 2001 23:57:53 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• November 27, 2001
  • Re: Mauve testing, Brian Jones, 23:57
  • Re: Mauve testing, Nic Ferrier, 05:16
  • Re: Mauve testing, Tom Tromey, 00:08
• November 26, 2001
  • Mauve testing, Brian Jones, 22:16
• November 25, 2001
  • help!thanks!, 黄 铁卓, 21:59
• November 23, 2001
  • Re (2): Bug Report, reali, 12:53
• November 22, 2001
  • Re: <classpath>porting classpath to c# to get java <--> c#, Bryce McKinlay, 22:36
  • Re: [pnetdiscuss] Re: <classpath>porting classpath to c# to get java <--> c#, Fergus Henderson, 09:22
  • Re: <classpath>porting classpath to c# to get java <--> c#, Per Arneng, 07:56
  • Re: <classpath>porting classpath to c# to get java <--> c#, Artur Biesiadowski, 07:17
  • <classpath>porting classpath to c# to get java <--> c#, Per Arneng, 06:26
• November 20, 2001
  • Re: Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code), Richard Stallman, 05:57
  • Re: Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code), Etienne M. Gagnon, 00:21
• November 19, 2001
  • Re: Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code), Etienne M. Gagnon, 23:56
  • Re: Serialver [was Re: [PATCH]], Dalibor Topic, 22:35
  • Re: [PATCH], Dalibor Topic, 21:47
  • Re: Serialver [was Re: [PATCH]], Bryce McKinlay, 20:31
  • Re: Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code), Nic Ferrier, 12:52
  • Re: Serialver [was Re: [PATCH]], Eric Blake, 11:58
  • Re: Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code), Richard Stallman, 00:51
• November 18, 2001
  • Re: AmberArcher releases 500 java classes under the GPL, Brian Jones, 23:25
  • AmberArcher releases 500 java classes under the GPL, Kevin A. Burton, 23:11
  • Re: [PATCH], Brian Jones, 23:06
  • Re: [PATCH], Bryce McKinlay, 19:04
  • [PATCH], Dalibor Topic, 17:12
• November 16, 2001
  • Re: Bug Report, Brian Jones, 18:06
  • Re: automake/autoconf, Brian Jones, 18:05
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Brad Cox, 17:26
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 17:21
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Stuart Ballard, 16:56
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 16:05
  • Re: Bug Report, Mark Wielaard, 11:11
  • Re: automake/autoconf, Mark Wielaard, 10:03
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 09:15
• November 14, 2001
  • Re: compiling classpath with kopisusu, Brian Jones, 14:44
  • compiling classpath with kopisusu, jewel, 13:37
  • Re: kissme release 0.20, Brian Jones, 11:07
  • Re: kissme release 0.20, jewel, 10:41
  • Re: kissme release 0.20, Mark Wielaard, 10:31
  • Re: kissme release 0.20, jewel, 10:18
  • Re: kissme release 0.20, Brian Jones, 08:04
  • kissme release 0.20, jewel, 05:43
• November 13, 2001
  • Re: Bug Report, Brian Jones, 10:24
  • Re: Bug Report, Brian Jones, 09:10
  • Bug Report, reali, 08:30
  • Re: What classes used Wonka., Chris Gray, 04:31
  • Re: What classes used Wonka., Chris Gray, 04:27
  • Re (2): The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), reali, 03:16
• November 12, 2001
  • automake/autoconf, Brian Jones, 23:15
  • Re: What classes used Wonka., Brian Jones, 23:12
  • Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Norbert Bollow, 18:20
  • Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Brian Jones, 17:10
  • Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Etienne M. Gagnon, 16:45
  • Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Brian Jones, 16:18
  • Clarification to the license of Classpath (excluding the AWT code), Etienne M. Gagnon, 11:44
  • The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Etienne M. Gagnon, 09:27
  • What classes used Wonka., Patrick Spingys, 04:47
• November 11, 2001
  • native state, Brian Jones, 23:20
  • Re: Classpath website, Brian Jones, 18:01
  • Re: Classpath website, Mark Wielaard, 17:50
  • Re: Classpath website, Brian Jones, 16:47
  • Re: Classpath website, Mark Wielaard, 16:08
  • Re: Classpath website, Mark Wielaard, 14:40
  • Re: Classpath website, Brian Jones, 13:50
  • Classpath website, Mark Wielaard, 11:35
• November 10, 2001
  • Re: kissme update, Mark Wielaard, 12:03
• November 09, 2001
  • kissme update, Brian Jones, 22:03
  • Re: Breaking VM integration interface, Mark Wielaard, 15:54
  • Re: The Unofficial GNU Classpath License Rationale, John Keiser, 14:37
  • Re: How mature are the Free Software efforts on Java?, Norbert Bollow, 13:07
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 12:03
  • The Unofficial GNU Classpath License Rationale, Etienne M. Gagnon, 11:22
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Chris Gray, 11:00
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Mark Wielaard, 08:40
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Mark Wielaard, 08:02
  • Re: How mature are the Free Software efforts on Java?, Artur Biesiadowski, 07:38
  • Re: How mature are the Free Software efforts on Java?, Mark Wielaard, 06:34
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 05:55
  • Re: testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 05:44
• November 08, 2001
  • Re: Licensing concerns, Brian Jones, 23:29
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Brian Jones, 23:22
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Brian Jones, 22:55
  • Re: Breaking VM integration interface, Bryce McKinlay, 20:49
  • Re: testing before a release, Bryce McKinlay, 20:39
  • Re: Breaking VM integration interface, Brian Jones, 19:29
  • Re: Jaos, a JVM for Oberon, Brian Jones, 19:19
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 18:41
  • Re: How mature are the Free Software efforts on Java?, Brian Jones, 18:40
  • Re: testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 18:27
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Tom Tromey, 18:22
  • Re: testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 18:19
  • Breaking VM integration interface, Mark Wielaard, 17:11
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Norbert Bollow, 15:28
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Etienne M. Gagnon, 14:16
  • Re: Decision process, Per Bothner, 13:46
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Per Bothner, 13:34
  • Decision process, Etienne M. Gagnon, 13:26
  • Re: How mature are the Free Software efforts on Java?, Tom Tromey, 12:55
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Etienne M. Gagnon, 11:49
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Chris Gray, 11:37
  • Re: testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 11:24
  • Re: testing before a release, Tom Tromey, 11:02
  • Re: testing before a release, Tom Tromey, 11:01
  • Re: First part of LICENSE file, Tom Tromey, 10:59
  • Re: Simple Proposal, reali, 10:24
  • Licensing concerns, Brad Cox, 10:13
  • Re: Simple Proposal, Etienne M. Gagnon, 10:13
  • Jaos, a JVM for Oberon, reali, 10:12
  • Simple Proposal, Etienne M. Gagnon, 09:53
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 09:33
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 09:16
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 09:02
  • Re: How mature are the Free Software efforts on Java?, Norbert Bollow, 08:41
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Chris Gray, 08:24
  • Re: First part of LICENSE file, Brian Jones, 07:55
  • Re: How mature are the Free Software efforts on Java?, Brian Jones, 07:53
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Brian Jones, 07:41
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 06:28
  • Re (3): testing before a release, reali, 05:15
  • How mature are the Free Software efforts on Java?, Norbert Bollow, 04:48
  • Re: First part of LICENSE file, Mark Wielaard, 03:12
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Fred Gray, 00:08
• November 07, 2001
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Per Bothner, 20:02
  • Re: testing before a release, Brian Jones, 19:58
  • Re: First part of LICENSE file, Brian Jones, 19:42
  • Re: testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 19:36
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Brian Jones, 19:35
  • Re: testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 19:30
  • Re: testing before a release, Per Bothner, 18:58
  • First part of LICENSE file, Mark Wielaard, 18:19
  • Re: testing before a release, Bryce McKinlay, 18:17
  • Re: testing before a release, Bryce McKinlay, 18:04
  • Re: testing before a release, Aaron M. Renn, 16:53
  • Re: testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 16:42
  • Re: testing before a release, Per Bothner, 15:07
  • Re: testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 13:51
  • Re: Re (3): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 12:23
  • Re (3): testing before a release, reali, 12:02
  • GPL facts, Etienne M. Gagnon, 11:58
  • Re: Re (2): testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 11:47
  • Re (2): testing before a release, reali, 11:30
  • Re: testing before a release, Etienne M. Gagnon, 10:47
  • Re: testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 09:47
  • Re: testing before a release, Brian Jones, 08:34
  • Re: Kissme, Mark Wielaard, 03:28
• November 06, 2001
  • Kissme, Brian Jones, 23:46
  • Re: System vs Runtime SecurityManager, Mark Wielaard, 19:57
  • Re: System vs Runtime SecurityManager, John Keisr, 19:20
  • System vs Runtime SecurityManager, Mark Wielaard, 18:16
  • Re: Potential bug in Hashtable, Bryce McKinlay, 03:00
  • Re: classpath ./ChangeLog lib/standard.omit, Bryce McKinlay, 02:57
• November 05, 2001
  • Re: testing before a release, Brian Jones, 21:15
  • Re: testing before a release, Brian Jones, 21:13
  • Re: testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 17:03
  • Re: testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 16:35
  • Re: testing before a release, Mark Wielaard, 15:44
• November 04, 2001
  • testing before a release, Brian Jones, 22:30
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Bryce McKinlay, 22:26
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Brian Jones, 22:24
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Brian Jones, 22:13
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Fred Gray, 22:02
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Bryce McKinlay, 18:03
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Brian Jones, 11:33
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Mark Wielaard, 04:08
• November 03, 2001
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Bryce McKinlay, 20:24
  • Re: gcj class lib, Bryce McKinlay, 18:09
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Mark Wielaard, 10:58
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Eric Blake, 10:40
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Mark Wielaard, 10:36
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Mark Wielaard, 10:28
  • gcj class lib, Brian Jones, 09:57
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Mark Wielaard, 09:37
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Bryce McKinlay, 00:36
• November 02, 2001
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Eric Blake, 23:59
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Tom Tromey, 23:52
  • Re: java.util.ResourceBundle bug?, Bryce McKinlay, 23:24
  • Re: Why upgrading sucks, Brian Jones, 07:06
  • Re: Why upgrading sucks, Eric Blake, 00:35
• November 01, 2001
  • Why upgrading sucks, Brian Jones, 23:52
  • Re: automake/libtool question, Tom Tromey, 16:10
  • automake/libtool question, Brian Jones, 09:07

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc