Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

dotgnu-general (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Mar 31 2002 19:17:17 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• March 31, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Binary releases for Portable.NET, Rhys Weatherley, 19:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]string subtiution does not work., Rhys Weatherley, 17:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]string subtiution does not work., Gopal.V, 15:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]string subtiution does not work., Gopal.V, 13:03
  • [DotGNU]string subtiution does not work., prashant patel, 11:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]InternalCall or: how to call system libs, Gopal.V, 10:55
  • Re: [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]C# compiler command line parsing, Fergus Henderson, 04:06
  • [DotGNU]Binary releases for Portable.NET, Gopal.V, 03:55
  • DONT DO THIS (was Re: [DotGNU]pnet build fix?), S11001001, 02:58
  • READ FIRST (was Re: [DotGNU]pnet build fix?), S11001001, 02:31
  • [DotGNU]pnet build fix?, S11001001, 02:23
• March 30, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Why DotGNU should use Jabber (I'm finally back :-), S11001001, 23:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]First draft Philosophy file, S11001001, 23:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Getting to work, S11001001, 23:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 20:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Getting to work, Gopal.V, 13:54
  • [DotGNU]Getting to work, Brandon Bremen, 13:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #377 - 2 msgs, Gopal.V, 11:57
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #377 - 2 msgs, Adam Theo, 09:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Why DotGNU should use Jabber (I'm finally back :-), Gopal.V, 02:28
  • [DotGNU]Why DotGNU should use Jabber (I'm finally back :-), Adam Theo, 00:56
• March 29, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Barry Fitzgerald, 23:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Matthew C. Tedder, 17:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Participation at SEE/DEE-Development, S11001001, 15:09
  • [DotGNU]First draft Philosophy file, Silvernerd, 13:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 12:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 12:52
  • [DotGNU]Binfmt (was: [Mono-list] RESULT: 0 from mono, not from mint.), t3rmin4t0r, 05:12
  • [DotGNU]New internalcall interface coming, Rhys Weatherley, 02:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]using the -shared option(.dll), Rhys Weatherley, 02:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]using the -shared option(.dll), prashant patel, 01:26
• March 28, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]InternalCall or: how to call system libs, Rhys Weatherley, 17:59
  • Re: [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]C# compiler command line parsing, Bob Smith, 17:53
  • [DotGNU]InternalCall or: how to call system libs, Timo --Blazko-- Boewing, 15:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]using the -shared option(.dll), Gopal.V, 15:51
  • [DotGNU]using the -shared option(.dll), prashant patel, 14:00
  • Re: [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]C# compiler command line parsing, Brad Wilson, 09:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Barry Fitzgerald, 07:25
  • [DotGNU]Participation at SEE/DEE-Development, Remy Apfelbacher, 06:36
  • [DotGNU][Fwd: [CoreTeam]Re: Microsoft Shared Source License and Portable.NET], Rhys Weatherley, 05:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]C# compiler command line parsing, Rhys Weatherley, 04:11
  • [DotGNU]Vim syntax file for C#, Gopal.V, 02:13
  • [DotGNU]C# compiler command line parsing, Fergus Henderson, 00:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]"is not declared in this scope", Gopal.V, 00:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Matthew C. Tedder, 00:39
  • Re: Linus Torvalds's beliefs (was Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here), Matthew C. Tedder, 00:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 00:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 00:02
• March 27, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Shared source CLI beta released, Matthew C. Tedder, 23:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Shared source CLI beta released, Matthew C. Tedder, 23:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]Shared source CLI beta released, Rhys Weatherley, 19:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]"is not declared in this scope", Rhys Weatherley, 19:29
  • [DotGNU]"is not declared in this scope", S11001001, 19:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]DEE/SEE and VRS, S11001001, 18:43
  • Re: AW: [DotGNU] Introduction, Rhys Weatherley, 18:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]C# libraries, Rhys Weatherley, 18:27
  • Re: AW: [DotGNU] Introduction, S11001001, 18:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Xml Assembly, Rhys Weatherley, 18:14
  • [DotGNU]C# libraries, Daniel Carrera, 17:56
  • Linus Torvalds's beliefs (was Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here), S11001001, 17:54
  • Re: AW: AW: [DotGNU] Introduction, Rhys Weatherley, 17:46
  • [DotGNU]System.Xml Assembly, Jakob Praher, 15:54
  • [DotGNU]The pnetlib-docs in place !, Gopal.V, 14:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Silvernerd, 14:15
  • RE: [DotGNU]Shared source CLI beta released, Barry Fitzgerald, 11:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]Business Models for Free Software, Gopal.V, 11:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]DEE/SEE and VRS, Gopal.V, 10:57
  • RE: [DotGNU]Shared source CLI beta released, Robert Isaacs, 10:48
  • RE: [DotGNU]Shared source CLI beta released, Robert Isaacs, 10:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]DEE/SEE and VRS, Daniel Carrera, 10:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Business Models for Free Software, Daniel Carrera, 09:52
  • AW: AW: [DotGNU] Introduction, Carsten Kuckuk, 09:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Shared source CLI beta released, Rhys Weatherley, 09:48
  • [DotGNU]Shared source CLI beta released, Robert Isaacs, 09:08
  • [DotGNU]DEE/SEE and VRS, Tim Terlegård, 08:22
  • AW: [DotGNU] Introduction, Carsten Kuckuk, 08:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Barry Fitzgerald, 07:40
  • Re: AW: [DotGNU] Introduction, Rhys Weatherley, 07:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Barry Fitzgerald, 07:35
  • Re: [DotGNU] Introduction, Gopal.V, 07:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib development, Gopal.V, 06:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib development, Gopal.V, 06:30
  • AW: [DotGNU] Introduction, Carsten Kuckuk, 06:08
  • [DotGNU].NET SDK, Carsten Kuckuk, 06:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Matthew C. Tedder, 02:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Matthew C. Tedder, 02:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Matthew C. Tedder, 02:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Matthew C. Tedder, 02:18
  • [DotGNU]Business Models for Free Software, Matthew C. Tedder, 02:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Matthew C. Tedder, 02:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET 0.3.2 released, Rhys Weatherley, 01:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]PowerPC incompatible, Rhys Weatherley, 01:28
  • [DotGNU]PowerPC incompatible, Brandon Bremen, 01:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET 0.3.2 released, Brandon Bremen, 01:11
  • [DotGNU]Portable.NET 0.3.2 released, Rhys Weatherley, 01:01
• March 26, 2002
  • [DotGNU]Temporary fix for automake 1.5 problems, Rhys Weatherley, 22:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]b0rked, Rhys Weatherley, 22:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib development, Rhys Weatherley, 22:29
  • [DotGNU]b0rked, Brandon Bremen, 21:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib development, Brandon Bremen, 20:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Rhys Weatherley, 20:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib development, Rhys Weatherley, 20:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib development, Daniel Carrera, 19:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib development, Brandon Bremen, 19:26
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib development, Brandon Bremen, 19:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, John, 19:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, David Nicol, 19:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, John, 19:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 18:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 18:25
  • DotGNU Manifesto? (was Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file), S11001001, 17:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, S11001001, 17:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Rhys Weatherley, 17:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib: Un*x file endings please, Hans-Olof Danielsson, 17:28
  • FW: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Jerry Walter, 17:26
  • Re: [DotGNU].NET SDK, Rhys Weatherley, 17:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Daniel Carrera, 17:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib: Un*x file endings please, S11001001, 16:48
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib: Un*x file endings please, S11001001, 16:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, John, 16:10
  • [DotGNU]Ignore my last message., Daniel Carrera, 14:31
  • [DotGNU].NET SDK, Daniel Carrera, 14:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Daniel Carrera, 13:46
  • [DotGNU]PHILOSOPHY file, Silvernerd, 13:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Contributing, Daniel Carrera, 12:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Introduction, Gopal.V, 09:45
  • [DotGNU]Re: Contributing, Gopal.V, 09:45
  • [DotGNU]Sun opens Java to Open Source community, Bill Lance, 07:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Introduction, Bill Lance, 07:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]Introduction, Rhys Weatherley, 07:15
  • [DotGNU]Introduction, Erik Rozendaal, 05:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]C#, Boris Kolar, 05:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 03:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]C#, Rhys Weatherley, 00:06
• March 25, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]C#, Fergus Henderson, 22:48
  • [DotGNU]C#, Daniel Carrera, 22:41
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib compiles as metadata, Rhys Weatherley, 21:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: payback time for MS & BSD, Daniel Carrera, 18:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: payback time for MS & BSD, Rhys Weatherley, 18:10
  • [DotGNU]Re: payback time for MS & BSD, Daniel Carrera, 17:06
  • payback time for MS & BSD...or, this subject line is getting too long (was Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))), S11001001, 16:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, S11001001, 16:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Matthew C. Tedder, 15:48
  • [DotGNU]Re: continuations in the real world? (fwd), Jay Sulzberger, 14:28
  • [DotGNU]Contributing, Daniel Carrera, 13:58
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Sasa J., 13:41
  • Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Barry Fitzgerald, 13:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:55
  • [DotGNU]Sun Aims to Extend Its Lead, Bill Lance, 11:04
  • [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Tony Stanco, 09:40
  • [DotGNU]Article on DotGNU at http://www.freelink.cx/, Norbert Bollow, 08:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Barry Fitzgerald, 07:40
  • Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 07:20
  • Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Rhys Weatherley, 07:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Gopal.V, 07:08
  • Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 07:08
  • AW: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 06:22
  • Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Tim Terlegård, 05:58
  • AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 05:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]My Introduction, Rhys Weatherley, 04:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]My Introduction, Gopal.V, 03:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Matthew C. Tedder, 03:24
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 03:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Timezone blues, Gopal.V, 03:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]A New Hope for Open Source and Java, S11001001, 00:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]Timezone blues, S11001001, 00:55
  • that's one less FUD (was Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))), S11001001, 00:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib devels: when shall we meet ?, S11001001, 00:41
  • [DotGNU]Timezone blues, Rhys Weatherley, 00:28
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), James Michael DuPont, 00:10
• March 24, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Affero General Public License, S11001001, 23:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]My Introduction, James Michael DuPont, 23:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Lead developers appointed, S11001001, 22:28
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (wasRe:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Seth Johnson, 21:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]My Introduction, Gopal.V, 21:24
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 21:08
  • [DotGNU]Brainstorm: System internals, Rhys Weatherley, 20:25
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), John, 18:54
  • RE: [DotGNU]treecc: -g option, nymia, 17:45
  • RE: [DotGNU]Walking The ILNode_List, nymia, 17:45
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Rhys Weatherley, 17:45
  • [DotGNU]My Introduction, Daniel Carrera, 16:49
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), David Sugar, 16:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, David Sugar, 16:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Gopal.V, 15:04
  • [DotGNU]The Pnetlib maintainer list ?, Gopal.V, 12:59
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 12:58
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 12:48
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Bill Lance, 12:26
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 11:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Gopal.V, 11:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Lead developers appointed, Gopal.V, 11:37
  • [DotGNU]"Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 11:04
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), James Michael DuPont, 11:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Jonathan P Springer, 09:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]A New Hope for Open Source and Java, Jonathan P Springer, 09:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Lead developers appointed, Jonathan P Springer, 09:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Philipp Haller, 08:59
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Bill Lance, 08:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Jonathan P Springer, 07:55
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Vrs-development] VRS and SEE/DEE goals, Chris Smith, 07:35
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 05:11
• March 23, 2002
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 12:42
  • [DotGNU]SocketException changes, Silvernerd, 03:26
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Norbert Bollow, 02:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]treecc: -g option, Norbert Bollow, 02:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Walking The ILNode_List, Gopal.V, 01:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Lead developers appointed, Gopal.V, 01:24
• March 22, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]treecc: -g option, Gopal.V, 23:48
  • [DotGNU]A New Hope for Open Source and Java, Bill Lance, 21:14
  • [DotGNU]Lead developers appointed, Rhys Weatherley, 19:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]Walking The ILNode_List, Rhys Weatherley, 18:53
  • [DotGNU]Walking The ILNode_List, nymia, 17:48
  • RE: [DotGNU]treecc: -g option, nymia, 17:43
  • Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Bill Lance, 13:36
  • Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Barry Fitzgerald, 13:15
  • AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 12:59
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Barry Fitzgerald, 12:54
  • [DotGNU]IBM, Energy Department to deploy first Grid computing systems, Bill Lance, 10:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]treecc: -g option, Norbert Bollow, 10:20
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib devels: when shall we meet ?, Gopal.V, 08:49
  • [DotGNU]Fwd: [Vrs-development] VRS Development Idea, Chris Smith, 08:44
  • AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 08:40
  • Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), David Sugar, 08:27
  • this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 05:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Norbert Bollow, 05:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Affero General Public License, Norbert Bollow, 05:46
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib converted to use csant, Rhys Weatherley, 01:49
  • [DotGNU]treecc: -g option, nymia, 00:27
• March 21, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]cscc::optimisation::literals, Rhys Weatherley, 22:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]cscc::optimisation::literals, Rhys Weatherley, 21:45
  • [DotGNU]treecc: node hierarchy proof-of-concept, nymia, 20:44
  • [DotGNU]cscc::optimisation::literals, S11001001, 19:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, S11001001, 19:40
  • this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables), S11001001, 19:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]treecc list of nodes in tree format, Rhys Weatherley, 17:39
  • [DotGNU]treecc: Locating the top node, nymia, 17:13
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Vrs-development] initial questions, Bill Lance, 16:01
  • [DotGNU]treecc list of nodes in tree format, nymia, 16:01
  • Re: address@hidden (was Re: [DotGNU]FOSE SELinux Panel), James Michael DuPont, 09:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]Affero General Public License, Gopal.V, 07:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Gopal.V, 06:35
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 06:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables, Carsten Kuckuk, 06:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]bascc, Rhys Weatherley, 02:40
  • [DotGNU]bascc, nymia, 00:39
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 00:01
• March 20, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Affero General Public License, S11001001, 21:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]Affero General Public License, Rhys Weatherley, 21:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]Affero General Public License, S11001001, 20:59
  • OT: address@hidden (was Re: [DotGNU]FOSE SELinux Panel), S11001001, 20:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, S11001001, 20:44
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 20:32
  • OT: learning curve (was Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts), S11001001, 20:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Rhys Weatherley, 20:05
  • [DotGNU]Open Source/Free Software in the Federal Government, Tony Stanco, 20:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Barry Fitzgerald, 19:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Barry Fitzgerald, 19:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Postmeeting VRS thinking and SEE, S11001001, 19:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Postmeeting VRS thinking and SEE, Bill Lance, 19:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Rhys Weatherley, 19:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Postmeeting VRS thinking and SEE, S11001001, 19:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables, Rhys Weatherley, 19:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Rhys Weatherley, 18:59
  • Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Bill Lance, 18:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Rhys Weatherley, 18:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rodrigo Moya, 18:20
  • [DotGNU]The Problem with .NET, Bill Lance, 18:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Gopal.V, 15:52
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 15:52
  • [DotGNU]committing classes in System.Net, Gopal.V, 15:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables, David Sugar, 15:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]IList.Count problem + webservice API + status page bug, Gerard Toonstra, 13:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]IList.Count problem + webservice API + status page bug, Silvernerd, 13:42
  • Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Norbert Bollow, 13:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Fergus Henderson, 12:46
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 12:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Norbert Bollow, 12:06
  • Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Bill Lance, 11:42
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib developers...please note, Gopal.V, 11:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Paolo Molaro, 10:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Norbert Bollow, 09:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, James Michael DuPont, 09:01
  • [DotGNU]Affero General Public License, Bill Lance, 08:48
  • [DotGNU]Eclipse Project Keeps Rising, Bill Lance, 07:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Chris Smith, 07:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Norbert Bollow, 06:25
  • Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Tim Terlegård, 05:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Chris Smith, 05:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables, Norbert Bollow, 05:34
  • Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Norbert Bollow, 04:28
  • [DotGNU]Snapshot update, smiler, 02:47
• March 19, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables, Rhys Weatherley, 22:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables, Brandon Bremen, 22:25
  • [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables, Open Source, 22:16
  • Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Bill Lance, 19:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]What is the diff b/w pnetlib/System andpnetlib/runtime/System ?, Gopal.V, 19:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Open Source, 19:21
  • Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Rhys Weatherley, 18:49
  • Re: [Vrs-development] Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Bill Lance, 18:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]What is the diff b/w pnetlib/System and pnetlib/runtime/System ?, Christian Axelsson, 17:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]What is the diff b/w pnetlib/System andpnetlib/runtime/System ?, Rhys Weatherley, 17:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]What is the diff b/w pnetlib/System and pnetlib/runtime/System ?, Rhys Weatherley, 17:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]What is the diff b/w pnetlib/System and pnetlib/runtime/System ?, Gerard Toonstra, 17:09
  • [DotGNU]What is the diff b/w pnetlib/System and pnetlib/runtime/System ?, Gopal.V, 16:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]IList.Count problem + webservice API + status page bug, Rhys Weatherley, 16:38
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Website]Snapshots up!, Gopal.V, 14:26
  • [DotGNU]Snapshots up!, Christian Axelsson, 13:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]IList.Count problem + webservice API + status page bug, Gerard Toonstra, 13:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Norbert Bollow, 13:24
  • [DotGNU]IList.Count problem + webservice API + status page bug, Silvernerd, 13:13
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib and the VRS, SEE and other server concepts, Chris Smith, 12:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Christian Axelsson, 12:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, smiler, 11:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]FOSE SELinux Panel, Norbert Bollow, 11:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Gopal.V, 10:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, Christoph Wille, 08:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, smiler, 08:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Rhys Weatherley, 07:43
  • [DotGNU]FOSE SELinux Panel, Tony Stanco, 06:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, smiler, 06:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, Gopal.V, 05:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, Gopal.V, 05:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, Gopal.V, 05:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Gopal.V, 05:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, Gopal.V, 05:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, Christoph Wille, 02:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, Norbert Bollow, 00:30
  • [DotGNU]Setting up developer CVS access, Rhys Weatherley, 00:26
• March 18, 2002
  • [DotGNU]dotGNU vs .NET A complete solution?, Brandon Bremen, 21:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Open Source, 17:13
  • [DotGNU]Postmeeting VRS thinking and SEE, Bill Lance, 11:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]4th/5th session summary, Gopal.V, 11:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]interfaces not working, Gopal.V, 11:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Gopal.V, 09:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]interfaces not working, Rhys Weatherley, 09:13
  • [DotGNU]interfaces not working, prashant patel, 08:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Patch approval procedures, Gopal.V, 07:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Paolo Molaro, 06:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib, Rhys Weatherley, 02:21
  • [DotGNU]Patch approval procedures, Rhys Weatherley, 02:03
• March 17, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Adam Treat, 23:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 22:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]Treecc and pnet changes - important, Barry Fitzgerald, 22:31
  • [DotGNU]Meet-a-thon : the whole log....., Gopal.V, 22:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Barry Fitzgerald, 22:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, David Sugar, 21:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Adam Treat, 20:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 20:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Adam Treat, 18:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Adam Treat, 18:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib, Gerard Toonstra, 17:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 17:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Paolo Molaro, 15:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib, Gopal.V, 13:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Barry Fitzgerald, 13:32
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib, Gerard Toonstra, 13:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Paolo Molaro, 09:11
  • [DotGNU]Treecc and pnet changes - important, Rhys Weatherley, 05:52
  • [DotGNU]FWD: 4th/5th session summary, Gopal.V, 04:12
  • [DotGNU]4th/5th session summary, S11001001, 03:22
• March 16, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, S11001001, 23:17
  • [DotGNU]2nd/3rd session summary, S11001001, 22:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Request For Tutorial, Gopal.V, 14:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Barry Fitzgerald, 14:10
  • [DotGNU]Request For Tutorial, Abhaya Agarwal, 13:48
  • [DotGNU]Project Rosebud, Gerard Toonstra, 12:15
  • [DotGNU]The summary of the first session, Gopal.V, 10:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 07:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Paolo Molaro, 05:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Gopal.V, 04:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Adam Treat, 04:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 02:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Adam Treat, 01:10
• March 15, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Rhys Weatherley, 20:35
  • [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 17:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]cscc compiling pnetlib, Rhys Weatherley, 16:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Open Source, 16:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 15:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 13:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 13:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 12:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 12:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 12:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 12:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., David Sugar, 10:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Norbert Bollow, 09:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 09:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 09:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Rodrigo Moya, 08:48
  • [DotGNU]cscc compiling pnetlib, abhayag, 08:23
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 07:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 07:47
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 07:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 07:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., David Sugar, 06:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 06:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 06:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 05:52
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Hans Zandbelt, 05:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Roland Ljungh, 05:00
  • [DotGNU]Freport Update, John, 03:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., James Michael DuPont, 02:59
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 02:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: [Auth]IDsec for PHP 1.0, Gopal V, 02:39
• March 14, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Rhys Weatherley, 22:24
  • [DotGNU]Platform.DirMethods, Open Source, 22:11
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 19:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., S11001001, 19:31
  • OT: ilrun (was Re: [DotGNU]Introspector & Treecc), S11001001, 19:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Just of of curiosity --, James Michael DuPont, 18:49
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 18:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Just of of curiosity --, Rhys Weatherley, 17:41
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 17:32
  • [DotGNU]Just of of curiosity --, Bill Lance, 16:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., James Michael DuPont, 15:49
  • [DotGNU]Re: [Auth]IDsec for PHP 1.0, Albert Scherbinsky, 14:41
  • [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 13:54
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 12:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]IDsec for PHP 1.0, Gopal.V, 12:37
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 12:37
  • [DotGNU]Interview: Irving Wladawsky-Berger explains Grid Computing, Bill Lance, 11:52
  • [DotGNU]Fw: [German] Heise News-Ticker: Steve Ballmer: Kein Tänzchen an der Leine, Tony Stanco, 08:34
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 07:05
  • Re: [Website]Re: [DotGNU]Meet-a-thon -- Please forward.., Gopal.V, 06:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]Meet-a-thon -- Please forward.. (some thoughts), Gopal.V, 06:45
  • [DotGNU]IDsec for PHP 1.0, Hans Zandbelt, 06:31
• March 13, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Meet-a-thon -- Please forward.. (some thoughts), John, 21:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]Meet-a-thon -- Please forward.., Barry Fitzgerald, 17:16
  • [DotGNU]Terrarium, Bill Lance, 16:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]Good Analysis of the JVM and the CLR, Jakob Praher, 15:34
  • [DotGNU]Good Analysis of the JVM and the CLR, Bill Lance, 15:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Meet-a-thon -- Please forward.., Gopal.V, 10:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Meet-a-thon -- Please forward.., Bill Lance, 10:07
  • [DotGNU]Meet-a-thon -- Please forward.., Gopal.V, 10:04
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 08:13
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 08:00
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 07:30
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Norbert Bollow, 06:56
• March 12, 2002
  • [DotGNU]Market Opportunity Analysis For Open Source Software, Bill Lance, 17:48
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 14:49
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Norbert Bollow, 14:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Bill Lance, 10:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, David Sugar, 07:33
  • Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 07:32
  • [DotGNU]Building Portable .NET under Cygwin, Ted Neward, 07:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Gopal.V, 07:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Norbert Bollow, 07:09
  • Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 07:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Gopal.V, 07:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 06:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Rhys Weatherley, 06:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 06:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Gopal.V, 06:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 05:16
  • [DotGNU]Article on treecc, Rhys Weatherley, 04:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Rhys Weatherley, 04:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 04:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Fergus Henderson, 03:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Gopal.V, 03:02
• March 11, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Sun takes on Passport--with hardware, Rhys Weatherley, 21:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Rhys Weatherley, 21:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]Warning! Cscc rearrangement in progress!, Rhys Weatherley, 20:58
  • [DotGNU]Sun takes on Passport--with hardware, Bill Lance, 20:58
  • new version of GPL? (was Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), S11001001, 20:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]The Future of Mandrake Linux., S11001001, 19:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 18:52
  • [DotGNU]The Future of Mandrake Linux., Bill Lance, 18:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, S11001001, 17:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]contribute?, Bill Lance, 17:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]contribute?, Open Source, 17:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 14:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 14:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Norbert Bollow, 14:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., David Sugar, 14:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]Mono's MCS Compiles Itself On Linux, Paolo Molaro, 13:59
  • [DotGNU]FWD : Re: Mono., Gopal.V, 13:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 13:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Gopal.V, 13:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]Mono's MCS Compiles Itself On Linux, Gopal.V, 13:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Gopal.V, 13:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Mono's MCS Compiles Itself On Linux, Paolo Molaro, 12:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 12:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Gopal.V, 11:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Bill Lance, 11:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Mono's MCS Compiles Itself On Linux, Gopal.V, 11:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Tim Terlegård, 10:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Barry Fitzgerald, 10:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Norbert Bollow, 10:10
  • [DotGNU]Time for a huddle....., Gopal.V, 09:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Norbert Bollow, 09:36
  • [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 07:49
  • Odp: [DotGNU]Warning! Cscc rearrangement in progress!, Alfa Rabi, 07:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 07:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]And the winner is ... Gumbo!, Norbert Bollow, 07:43
  • [DotGNU]Mono's MCS Compiles Itself On Linux, Bill Lance, 07:17
• March 10, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib platform dep?, Rhys Weatherley, 16:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]Identity, Mario D. Santana, 14:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Identity, Bill Lance, 13:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib platform dep?, S11001001, 12:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Identity, Mario D. Santana, 12:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 11:01
• March 09, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU] Ada95 (was Inferno Papers), Rhys Weatherley, 20:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 18:10
  • [DotGNU]Rotor, Rhys Weatherley, 17:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]And the winner is ... Gumbo!, Glenn Chambers, 14:03
  • [DotGNU]Starting on System.Net.Sockets.Socket, Silvernerd, 12:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Problems compiled PNET on LINUX PPC, Christian Gross, 09:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]contribute?, Gopal.V, 08:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]And the winner is ... Gumbo!, Gopal.V, 08:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]contribute?, Bill Lance, 07:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 06:13
• March 08, 2002
  • Re: AW: [DotGNU]PE File Format Specification gone?, Seth Johnson, 22:54
  • [DotGNU]contribute?, Open Source, 20:42
  • [DotGNU]And the winner is ... Gumbo!, Rhys Weatherley, 20:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Problems compiled PNET on LINUX PPC, Rhys Weatherley, 20:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Problems compiled PNET on LINUX PPC, Gopal.V, 19:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 15:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Native Socket Methods, Gopal.V, 10:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]table span problem, Tim Terlegård, 09:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 09:17
  • [DotGNU]table span problem, Tim Terlegård, 08:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Bill Lance, 07:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 04:11
  • [DotGNU]Native Socket Methods, Charlie Carnow, 00:49
• March 07, 2002
  • [DotGNU]Problems compiled PNET on LINUX PPC, Christian Gross, 19:00
  • [DotGNU]Obs, Mike Warner, 18:51
  • [DotGNU]Obmil, Mike Warner, 18:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Rhys Weatherley, 17:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Norbert Bollow, 13:48
  • [DotGNU]Rhys quoted in ZD-Net article..., John, 13:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, John, 13:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Chris Smith, 13:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Michael Khaw, 12:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Gopal.V, 10:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Tim Terlegård, 09:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Jonathan P Springer, 07:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Write(System.String,char) missing ?, Gopal.V, 06:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Norbert Bollow, 05:18
  • [DotGNU](patch) improved error messages with cscc, Sriram Karra, 04:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Rhys Weatherley, 04:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Hans-Olof Danielsson, 04:29
  • [DotGNU]Warning! Cscc rearrangement in progress!, Rhys Weatherley, 02:29
• March 06, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Jonathan P Springer, 22:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Write(System.String,char) missing ?, Open Source, 21:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Write(System.String,char) missing ?, Rhys Weatherley, 21:03
  • [DotGNU]System.Write(System.String,char) missing ?, Open Source, 19:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Rhys Weatherley, 18:34
  • Re: [Website]Re: [DotGNU]Time to update the status page., Rhys Weatherley, 18:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Threading, Gopal.V, 15:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Time to update the status page., Gopal.V, 15:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Bill Lance, 09:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Tim Terlegård, 08:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Rhys Weatherley, 08:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, David Sugar, 07:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Threading, Norbert Bollow, 07:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Threading, Rhys Weatherley, 06:52
  • [DotGNU]System.Threading, Abhaya Agarwal\s, 05:13
  • [DotGNU]Time to update the status page., Abhaya Agarwal, 02:55
  • [DotGNU]Socket Classes, Mike Warner, 02:49
• March 05, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Parse Error With Pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 23:57
  • [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Rhys Weatherley, 23:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib platform dep?, Rhys Weatherley, 23:06
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib platform dep?, S11001001, 22:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnet and Compatibility libraries, David Sugar, 21:16
  • APR? (was Re: [DotGNU]Pnet and Compatibility libraries), S11001001, 21:10
  • [DotGNU]Parse Error With Pnet, Open Source, 20:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnet and Compatibility libraries, Rhys Weatherley, 20:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]Uncovering Rotor -- A Shared Source CLI, Bill Lance, 17:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Uncovering Rotor -- A Shared Source CLI, Rhys Weatherley, 17:27
  • [DotGNU]Pnet and Compatibility libraries, Gopal.V, 12:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]Uncovering Rotor -- A Shared Source CLI, Bill Lance, 10:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Uncovering Rotor -- A Shared Source CLI, David Sugar, 09:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Uncovering Rotor -- A Shared Source CLI, Rhys Weatherley, 08:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnet networking library, Gopal.V, 08:03
  • [DotGNU]Uncovering Rotor -- A Shared Source CLI, Bill Lance, 07:46
  • [DotGNU]Pnet networking library, Abhaya Agarwal, 04:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnet runtime support for networking, Gopal.V, 03:42
• March 04, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnet runtime support for networking, Rhys Weatherley, 19:03
  • [DotGNU]Pnet runtime support for networking, Silvernerd, 13:16
• March 03, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]How's the wiki project going?, Gopal.V, 10:45
  • Re: [DotGNU]How's the wiki project going?, Jonathan P Springer, 10:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]How's the wiki project going?, Matthew L Daniel, 00:10
• March 02, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]OT?: silly C# questions, Rhys Weatherley, 18:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]How's the wiki project going?, Jonathan P Springer, 17:30
  • [DotGNU]OT?: silly C# questions, S11001001, 15:35
  • [DotGNU]System.Threading.Timer, Abhaya Agarwal, 15:14
  • [DotGNU]How's the wiki project going?, Bill Lance, 09:41
• March 01, 2002
  • [DotGNU]REST stands for REpresentational State Transfer, Bill Lance, 18:33
  • [DotGNU]The Eight Fallacies of Distributed Computing, Bill Lance, 16:11
  • [DotGNU]Implementations of .NET-Targeted Languages Problematic, Bill Lance, 07:35
  • Re: [DotGNU]Identity, Hans Zandbelt, 03:01

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc