Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

dotgnu-general (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue Apr 30 2002 15:41:57 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• April 30, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU.* namespaces -- Jabber & stuff, Gopal V, 15:41
  • [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU.* namespaces -- Jabber & stuff, Adam Theo, 15:21
  • [DotGNU]Jabber.net and stuff, Gopal V, 14:07
  • [DotGNU]Register based bytecode stuff..., Gopal V, 14:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Monthly newsletter, Gopal V, 14:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Is Forum an active development proposal?, David Sugar, 08:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Is Forum an active development proposal?, Barry Fitzgerald, 07:56
• April 29, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Is Forum an active development proposal?, David Sugar, 22:12
  • [DotGNU]Re: Last chance, newbies, Gopal V, 14:49
  • [DotGNU]Monthly newsletter, Silvernerd, 13:06
  • [DotGNU]Re: Last chance, newbies, Silvernerd, 13:06
  • [DotGNU]Is Forum an active development proposal?, Silvernerd, 13:06
  • [DotGNU]MSTV Basic to use .NET Compact Framework, James Mc Parlane, 01:14
• April 28, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU.* namespaces -- Jabber & stuff, Gopal V, 10:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU.* namespaces -- Jabber & stuff, Jonathan P Springer, 08:49
  • Re: Last chance, newbies (was: [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap), Gopal V, 06:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap, Gopal V, 06:27
  • [DotGNU]DotGNU.* namespaces -- Jabber & stuff, Gopal V, 06:12
  • Re: Last chance, newbies (was: [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap), Silvernerd, 04:56
• April 27, 2002
  • [DotGNU]Re: Entry Point Bug, Rhys Weatherley, 21:14
  • Re: Last chance, newbies (was: [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap), Brandon Bremen, 18:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap, Gopal V, 13:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap, Gopal V, 12:59
  • Last chance, newbies (was: [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap), Gopal . V, 12:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap, Silvernerd, 10:49
  • [DotGNU]Forum Update 27-apr-2002, Silvernerd, 10:25
  • [DotGNU]This Week's Pnet Roadmap, Gopal V, 10:23
  • [DotGNU]ChangeLog updating, Silvernerd, 07:34
• April 26, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]OT: rant on ECMA BCL, Rhys Weatherley, 18:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET roadmap idea & next meet., S11001001, 16:21
  • [DotGNU]OT: rant on ECMA BCL, S11001001, 16:03
  • [DotGNU]System.IO.Stream.Position, S11001001, 16:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET roadmap idea & next meet., Gopal . V, 14:27
  • [DotGNU]This Week in DotGNU -- 26/04/2002, Gopal . V, 14:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]Portable.NET roadmap idea & next meet., Gopal . V, 13:38
  • [DotGNU]Portable.NET roadmap idea & next meet., Gopal . V, 13:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]error in make pnet, Enrico Donelli, 03:52
• April 25, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Status of Forum?, Silvernerd, 13:12
  • Re: Re: [Gnue-dev] Re: Re: [DotGNU]GEASv2, Asif Ali, 08:34
  • Re: Re: [DotGNU]GEASv2, David Sugar, 08:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]GEASv2, David Sugar, 08:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]GEASv2, David Sugar, 08:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]Components performance...COM+ services ?, David Sugar, 08:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Status of Forum?, David Sugar, 08:07
  • Re: [Gnue-dev] Re: Re: [DotGNU]GEASv2, Reinhard Mueller, 07:57
  • Re: Re: [DotGNU]GEASv2, Asif Ali, 07:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]GEASv2, Andrew Mitchell, 07:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]GEASv2, James Michael DuPont, 06:40
  • [DotGNU]GEASv2, Asif Ali, 06:31
  • [DotGNU](no subject), Andrew Mitchell, 05:44
  • [DotGNU]Portable.NET Status 25 April 2002, Rhys Weatherley, 05:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Components performance...COM+ services ?, Andrew Mitchell, 02:19
  • [DotGNU]Components performance...COM+ services ?, Asif Ali, 01:58
• April 24, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Status of Forum?, Barry Fitzgerald, 20:23
  • [DotGNU]Status of Forum?, Silvernerd, 13:10
• April 22, 2002
  • [DotGNU]The JISC Information Environment and Web Services, Seth Johnson, 23:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]A small wiki like faq idea, S11001001, 20:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]Status of Jabber?, Barry Fitzgerald, 19:22
  • Re: [DotGNU]A small wiki like faq idea, Bill Lance, 18:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber & Authentication, Adam Theo, 15:32
  • [DotGNU]A small wiki like faq idea, Gopal . V, 15:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber & Authentication, Jonathan P Springer, 12:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber & Authentication, Chris Smith, 12:13
  • [DotGNU]How to get docs &stuff (was: [DotGNU]hello), Gopal . V, 11:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber & Authentication, Gopal . V, 11:07
  • [DotGNU]Status of Jabber?, Adam Theo, 03:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]hello, Rhys Weatherley, 02:27
  • [DotGNU]hello, Asif Ali, 01:59
  • [DotGNU]Jabber & Authentication, Jonathan P Springer, 00:24
• April 21, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]System compiles cleanly under csc, Rhys Weatherley, 21:41
  • Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, Barry Fitzgerald, 20:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]System compiles cleanly under csc, Rhys Weatherley, 18:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.IO namespace, Gopal . V, 09:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]System compiles cleanly under csc, Gopal . V, 09:56
  • [DotGNU]Second Generation Web Services, Bill Lance, 08:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]System compiles cleanly under csc, Rhys Weatherley, 05:39
  • Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, Silvernerd, 05:27
  • [DotGNU]Revision 3 Philosophy file, Silvernerd, 05:27
• April 20, 2002
  • [DotGNU]System compiles cleanly under csc, Rhys Weatherley, 23:40
  • [DotGNU]System.IO namespace, S11001001, 20:03
  • Re: [DotGNU]timezone question, Iain Hallam, 18:53
  • [DotGNU]Pnetlib tests required for System.Int* classes ?, Gopal . V, 14:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Silvernerd, 12:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, David Sugar, 10:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, Barry Fitzgerald, 10:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]timezone question, Barry Fitzgerald, 10:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, David Sugar, 10:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]W3C strives for royalty-free patent policy, Barry Fitzgerald, 10:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Barry Fitzgerald, 09:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Tim TerlegÃ¥rd, 09:37
  • [DotGNU]Portable.NET 0.3.4 and treecc 0.1.0 debian packages, Andrew Mitchell, 08:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, Silvernerd, 07:00
  • [DotGNU]Portable 0.3.4 and pnetlib 0.1.8 released, Rhys Weatherley, 01:58
• April 19, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]timezone question, Gopal . V, 23:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]timezone question, Andy Kilner, 22:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]timezone question, Rhys Weatherley, 19:40
  • Re: [DotGNU]timezone question, Peter Saint-Andre, 18:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]C# properties virtual by default?, Rhys Weatherley, 18:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]timezone question, Rhys Weatherley, 18:27
  • [DotGNU]C# properties virtual by default?, S11001001, 17:36
  • [DotGNU]timezone question, S11001001, 17:35
  • [DotGNU]W3C strives for royalty-free patent policy, Bill Lance, 17:00
  • [DotGNU]MySQL update! Re: Example SQL and XML of DOTGNU/CSCC/csnodes.c, James Michael DuPont, 16:48
  • [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Silvernerd, 13:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #411 - 9 msgs, Rhys Weatherley, 02:00
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #411 - 9 msgs, John Rebbeck, 00:39
• April 18, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Just Some Comments/Analysis, Barry Fitzgerald, 22:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, Barry Fitzgerald, 22:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Speaking of World Domination..., Rick R, 20:45
  • [DotGNU]Speaking of World Domination..., Brandon Bremen, 20:12
  • [DotGNU]Will patents drive us to REST?, Bill Lance, 19:32
  • [DotGNU]Example SQL and XML of DOTGNU/CSCC/csnodes.c, James Michael DuPont, 18:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, Silvernerd, 13:08
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) MS Passport to be used as ID by Feds, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:54
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) MS Passport to be used as ID by Feds, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:48
  • [DotGNU](slashdot) MS Passport to be used as ID by Feds, Gopal . V, 12:25
  • [DotGNU]Portable.NET weekly meet ....., Gopal . V, 10:58
  • [DotGNU]Just Some Comments/Analysis, Seth Johnson, 06:43
• April 17, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnet RPMS (for today's CVS), Gopal . V, 15:03
  • [DotGNU]Pnet RPMS (for today's CVS), Gopal . V, 14:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]Compiling PnetLib, Gopal . V, 10:53
  • RE: [DotGNU]Compiling PnetLib, Jerry Walter, 10:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]Compiling PnetLib, Gopal . V, 10:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, Gopal . V, 10:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Peter Saint-Andre, 09:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]CVS problem, Mario D. Santana, 09:25
  • [DotGNU]CVS problem, mytpmail, 09:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]Compiling PnetLib, Rhys Weatherley, 08:22
  • RE: [DotGNU]Compiling PnetLib, Jerry Walter, 07:56
  • [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001, Silvernerd, 07:41
  • [DotGNU]Religion and Free Software projects, Barry Fitzgerald, 07:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM drops Internet patent bombshell, Barry Fitzgerald, 07:12
  • [DotGNU]IBM drops Internet patent bombshell, Carsten Kuckuk, 05:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, James Michael DuPont, 01:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, James Michael DuPont, 00:58
• April 16, 2002
  • [DotGNU]IBM drops Internet patent bombshell, Bill Lance, 19:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Compiling PnetLib, Rhys Weatherley, 18:29
  • [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Adam Theo, 17:30
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Adam Theo, 17:16
  • [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Richard Stallman, 16:22
  • [DotGNU]Compiling PnetLib, Jerry Walter, 15:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Interesting interface idea., Çaðýl, 13:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Interesting interface idea., Dave Sherohman, 10:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]error in make pnet, Gopal . V, 09:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Interesting interface idea., James Michael DuPont, 07:59
  • Re: [DotGNU]error in make pnet, Gopal . V, 07:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]error in make pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 07:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]Interesting interface idea., Barry Fitzgerald, 07:16
  • [DotGNU]error in make pnet, Enrico Donelli, 06:41
  • [DotGNU]Interesting interface idea., John Rebbeck, 05:01
• April 15, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Barry Fitzgerald, 22:53
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, David Sugar, 20:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Richard Stallman, 18:05
  • Re: [DotGNU]WSIO goes RAND, Barry Fitzgerald, 17:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Barry Fitzgerald, 17:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Barry Fitzgerald, 17:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #404 - 8 msgs, Barry Fitzgerald, 17:16
  • [DotGNU]WSIO goes RAND, Bill Lance, 12:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Bill Lance, 09:39
  • [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Norbert Bollow, 08:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Chris Smith, 08:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Chris Smith, 07:52
  • [DotGNU]Talking to your PC is possible., John Rebbeck, 05:41
  • [DotGNU]Re: Developers digest, Vol 1 #404 - 8 msgs, John Rebbeck, 05:25
• April 14, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Barry Fitzgerald, 18:24
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, David Sugar, 17:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Barry Fitzgerald, 16:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, David Sugar, 16:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Bill Lance, 13:09
  • [DotGNU]Re: Open-Source Movement's GPL, Richard Stallman, 12:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Barry Fitzgerald, 11:13
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Bill Lance, 08:52
  • Re: [DotGNU]Help with Jabber, Gopal.V, 03:12
  • Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Daniel E Baumann, 01:11
• April 13, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Peter Saint-Andre, 23:38
  • [DotGNU]CVS commit protocol, Rhys Weatherley, 20:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Bill Lance, 20:16
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Barry Fitzgerald, 16:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:34
  • Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Help with Jabber, Charlie Carnow, 15:25
  • [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Richard Stallman, 15:13
  • Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Barry Fitzgerald, 15:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, S11001001, 14:31
  • [DotGNU]IBM, Microsoft plot Net takeover, Bill Lance, 07:42
  • [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Silvernerd, 06:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Silvernerd, 06:29
  • [DotGNU]Meeting times, Silvernerd, 06:29
  • [DotGNU]DotGNU meeting in progress, Rhys Weatherley, 06:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Forms: shall we?, Rhys Weatherley, 03:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Forms: shall we?, Gopal.V, 03:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Forms: shall we?, Gopal.V, 02:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Forms: shall we?, Daniel Carrera, 00:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib::csunit, Gopal.V, 00:36
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Gopal.V, 00:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Gopal.V, 00:34
• April 12, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]System.Forms: shall we?, Rhys Weatherley, 19:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, David Sugar, 19:20
  • Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Bradley M. Kuhn, 19:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Bradley M. Kuhn, 19:00
  • [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Peter Saint-Andre, 18:15
  • [DotGNU]System.Forms: shall we?, Timo --Blazko-- Boewing, 18:05
  • [DotGNU]Open-Source Movement's GPL, Çaðýl, 17:58
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Richard Stallman, 15:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Help with Jabber, David Sugar, 14:14
  • [DotGNU]Help with Jabber, Adam Theo, 14:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib::csunit, Sriram Karra, 09:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Barry Fitzgerald, 07:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Chris Smith, 05:33
  • [DotGNU]Weekly Pnet meeting 13-04-2002, Gopal.V, 04:26
  • [DotGNU]DotGNU Manifesto - first draft, Norbert Bollow, 00:35
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps Hailstorm ?, Norbert Bollow, 00:35
• April 11, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Barry Fitzgerald, 21:27
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Barry Fitzgerald, 21:19
  • Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Barry Fitzgerald, 21:09
  • [DotGNU]Portable.NET status 12 April 2002, Rhys Weatherley, 20:54
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, James Michael DuPont, 18:22
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Rhys Weatherley, 18:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Bill Lance, 17:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Norbert Bollow, 17:00
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Norbert Bollow, 17:00
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Common Public License, Norbert Bollow, 17:00
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Barry Fitzgerald, 13:44
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Matthew C. Tedder, 13:19
  • [DotGNU]Re: Concept: Forum, Silvernerd, 13:13
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:08
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Norbert Bollow, 12:03
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Norbert Bollow, 11:27
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Norbert Bollow, 11:27
  • RE: [DotGNU]MapPoint .NET, Jerry Walter, 10:20
  • [DotGNU]MapPoint .NET, Bill Lance, 09:01
  • Re: [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Rhys Weatherley, 03:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Gopal V, 03:31
  • [DotGNU](slashdot) Microsoft dumps hailstorm ?, Gopal V, 03:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Brandon Bremen, 01:44
• April 10, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]pnetlib::csunit, Rhys Weatherley, 21:57
  • pity the fool (was Re: [DotGNU]Pnetlib System.Net + System.Xml status update), S11001001, 21:20
  • [DotGNU]pnetlib::csunit, S11001001, 21:12
  • [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Adam Theo, 19:57
  • [DotGNU]Re: Common Public License, Daniel Carrera, 12:13
  • [DotGNU]Interesting article by Tim O'Reilly, Norbert Bollow, 10:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Concept: Forum, Norbert Bollow, 10:20
  • [DotGNU]Concept: Forum, Adam Theo, 05:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnetlib System.Net + System.Xml status update, Rhys Weatherley, 00:45
• April 09, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]developers & research lists, Rhys Weatherley, 20:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]developers & research lists, David Sugar, 20:04
  • Re: [DotGNU]Common Public License, Rhys Weatherley, 16:43
  • [DotGNU]OCL 0.3.0 Released, Smith, Scott D, 13:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Concept: Forum, Silvernerd, 13:19
  • [DotGNU]Common Public License, Bill Lance, 09:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]developers & research lists, Rich Hilliard, 09:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Intentional Programming/ .NET tools, Rich Hilliard, 09:17
  • [DotGNU]developers & research lists, Adam Theo, 01:59
• April 08, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Intentional Programming/ .NET tools, Gopal.V, 23:33
  • Re: [DotGNU]Intentional Programming/ .NET tools, James Michael DuPont, 19:36
  • [DotGNU](no subject), mytpmail, 19:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Concept: Forum, Gopal.V, 14:59
  • Newbie help (was: [DotGNU](no subject)), Gopal.V, 14:59
  • [DotGNU]Concept: Forum, Silvernerd, 13:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnetlib System.Net + System.Xml status update, Silvernerd, 13:05
  • [DotGNU](no subject), mytpmail, 11:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Intentional Programming/ .NET tools, Gopal.V, 11:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Intentional Programming/ .NET tools, Rhys Weatherley, 07:58
  • [DotGNU]Intentional Programming/ .NET tools, James Michael DuPont, 06:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]CVM instruction documentation, James Michael DuPont, 06:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Todays +GMT IRC meet -- 06-04-2002, James Michael DuPont, 06:17
  • Re: [DotGNU]Todays +GMT IRC meet -- 06-04-2002, Gopal.V, 05:00
  • [DotGNU]CVM instruction documentation, Rhys Weatherley, 03:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Todays +GMT IRC meet -- 06-04-2002, James Michael DuPont, 02:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]Todays +GMT IRC meet -- 06-04-2002, Sriram Karra, 00:30
• April 07, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnetlib System.Net + System.Xml status update, Rhys Weatherley, 18:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnetlib System.Net + System.Xml status update, Gopal.V, 13:36
  • [DotGNU]Pnetlib System.Net + System.Xml status update, Silvernerd, 05:03
• April 06, 2002
  • [DotGNU]RE: new Samba license? (was Re: [Mono-list] Samba Implications?), Michael Torrie, 17:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Snapshots down..., smiler, 17:33
  • [DotGNU]new Samba license? (was Re: [Mono-list] Samba Implications?), S11001001, 16:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Todays +GMT IRC meet -- 06-04-2002, James Michael DuPont, 13:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 12:38
  • [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 12:38
  • Re: [DotGNU]Introspector Update, James Michael DuPont, 12:37
  • [DotGNU]Todays +GMT IRC meet -- 06-04-2002, Gopal.V, 11:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]Introspector Update, Gopal.V, 11:56
  • [DotGNU]Introspector Update, James Michael DuPont, 08:09
  • [DotGNU]Hartmut on: Pseudo-Patent-Free Microsoft Standard, Seth Johnson, 05:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnet weekly meeting ?, Gopal.V, 05:06
  • Re: [DotGNU]Pnet weekly meeting ?, Silvernerd, 04:34
  • [DotGNU]Ecma Xml contradiction, Silvernerd, 04:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Gopal.V, 03:57
• April 05, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: J2EE Support in VRS, Rhys Weatherley, 18:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft prohibits GPLed work via licensing of CIFS standards, Rhys Weatherley, 18:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: J2EE Support in VRS, Open Source, 18:25
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Daniel Carrera, 17:42
  • [DotGNU]Re: Microsoft Prohibits GPLed Work via Licensing, Seth Johnson, 16:32
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft prohibits GPLed work via licensing of CIFS standards, Bill Lance, 15:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]Microsoft prohibits GPLed work via licensing of CIFS standards, Seth Johnson, 15:10
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Gopal.V, 14:14
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Daniel Carrera, 13:22
  • [DotGNU]Microsoft prohibits GPLed work via licensing of CIFS standards, Tony Stanco, 13:20
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Raghavendra Bhat, 12:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Barry Fitzgerald, 12:50
  • Re: [DotGNU]Snapshots down..., Gopal.V, 12:19
  • [DotGNU]Pnet weekly meeting ?, Gopal.V, 12:19
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Seth Johnson, 11:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: J2EE Support in VRS, Bill Lance, 09:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: J2EE Support in VRS, Chris Smith, 09:14
  • [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Tony Stanco, 08:57
  • [DotGNU]Re: J2EE Support in VRS, Ravi Mishra, 08:44
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Bill Lance, 07:48
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Roland Ljungh, 05:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Daniel Carrera, 03:05
  • [DotGNU]Re: "Open source" is not what we do here, Richard Stallman, 01:10
• April 04, 2002
  • [DotGNU]Portable.NET Status (5 April 2002), Rhys Weatherley, 22:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, Bill Lance, 19:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, S11001001, 19:51
  • >DotGNU goal? (was Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono), S11001001, 19:46
  • Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, Eric Altendorf, 19:26
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber - How to make it Official?, Seth Johnson, 16:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Bill Lance, 16:02
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Why DotGNU should use Jabber, Adam Theo, 15:55
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber - How to make it Official?, Adam Theo, 15:09
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Ravi Mishra, 14:48
  • Re: $user::user->Tell_Async ((was Re: [DotGNU]Why DotGNU should go Jabber, Adam Theo, 14:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, James Michael DuPont, 14:29
  • Re: [DotGNU]Revision 1 Philosophy file, Silvernerd, 12:37
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Chris Smith, 12:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Gopal.V, 12:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Angel \"Java\" Lopez, 11:57
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Gopal.V, 11:34
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Bill Lance, 11:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, Gopal.V, 11:15
  • Re: [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Gopal.V, 11:15
• April 03, 2002
  • [DotGNU]I want to contribute, Ravi Mishra, 21:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, Eric Altendorf, 13:13
  • [DotGNU]Pnetlib Status update, Gopal.V, 11:04
• April 02, 2002
  • Re: [DotGNU]InternalCall or: how to call system libs, Rhys Weatherley, 22:47
  • Re: [DotGNU]InternalCall or: how to call system libs, Gopal Vijayaraghava Menon, 21:56
  • Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, Gopal.V, 21:51
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Why DotGNU should use Jabber, Gopal.V, 21:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Re: Why DotGNU should use Jabber, John, 20:31
  • Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, Daniel Carrera, 18:23
  • Re: [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, Rhys Weatherley, 17:07
  • Re: [DotGNU]InternalCall or: how to call system libs, Rhys Weatherley, 16:54
  • [DotGNU]Where can I learn about DotGNU vs Mono, Eric Altendorf, 16:42
  • Re: [DotGNU]InternalCall or: how to call system libs, Timo --Blazko-- Boewing, 16:28
  • Re: [DotGNU]InternalCall or: how to call system libs, Timo --Blazko-- Boewing, 16:21
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber - How to make it Official?, Seth Johnson, 13:18
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber - How to make it Official, Adam Theo, 12:15
  • [DotGNU]Revision 1 Philosophy file, Silvernerd, 12:12
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber - How to make it Official, Chris Smith, 12:01
  • Re: [DotGNU]Jabber - How to make it Official, Chris Smith, 08:59
  • [DotGNU]Snapshots down..., Christian Axelsson, 04:10
• April 01, 2002
  • [Fwd: [DotGNU]New internalcall system], Rhys Weatherley, 20:43
  • Re: [DotGNU]Binary releases for Portable.NET, Rhys Weatherley, 19:49
  • Re: [DotGNU]Binary releases for Portable.NET, S11001001, 18:45
  • [DotGNU]Jabber Server Licensing, Adam Theo, 16:48
  • [DotGNU]Jabber - How to make it Official?, Adam Theo, 15:39
  • [DotGNU]Re: Why DotGNU should use Jabber, Adam Theo, 15:36
  • [DotGNU]New internalcall system, Rhys Weatherley, 01:11
  • Re: [DotGNU]string subtiution does not work., Rhys Weatherley, 01:03

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc