Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

help-make (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Feb 25 2006 18:56:33 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• February 25, 2006
  • make-3.81rc1 results, Martin Sebor, 18:56
  • gnu make misbehaves once VSS hits 2GB?, Dan Kegel, 15:24
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., Alessandro Vesely, 14:42
  • Re: Automatic build time inclusion, Brendan Heading, 10:09
  • Re: make-3.81rc1 - Cygwin bugs, test errors, gk, 10:07
  • Re: how the make "-I" option is passed to sub-makes, Robert P. J. Day, 09:36
  • Re: Automatic build time inclusion, Der Herr Hofrat, 09:33
  • Re: Need detail: backslash-newline sequences inside of single-quoted strings, gk, 09:22
  • Re: makedepend--how can I make it more efficient, Johan Bezem, 04:56
  • make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Matt England, 02:37
• February 24, 2006
  • Re: multiple/hidden targets again, sqweek, 23:13
  • (no subject), gk, 22:42
  • Re: Assigning $@ to target-specific variable, Dave Hylands, 16:27
  • Re: Need detail: backslash-newline sequences inside of single-quoted strings, Paul D. Smith, 16:11
  • Need detail: backslash-newline sequences inside of single-quoted strings, gk, 16:06
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., Jason Lunz, 15:35
  • Re: how the make "-I" option is passed to sub-makes, Paul D. Smith, 15:35
  • make-3.81rc1 - Cygwin bugs, test errors, gk, 14:36
  • Re: Assigning $@ to target-specific variable, Greg Chicares, 14:06
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., Paul D. Smith, 13:51
• February 23, 2006
  • Re: Assigning $@ to target-specific variable, John Graham-Cumming, 20:32
  • Re: Assigning $@ to target-specific variable, Paul D. Smith, 19:25
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., Greg Chicares, 19:25
  • how the make "-I" option is passed to sub-makes, Robert P. J. Day, 13:02
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., richard t, 00:13
  • makedepend--how can I make it more efficient, amit kumar, 00:13
  • Assigning $@ to target-specific variable, Ryan Berdeen, 00:13
• February 22, 2006
  • Re: multiple/hidden targets again, Alexander Frink, 20:49
  • Re: multiple/hidden targets again, John Graham-Cumming, 05:44
• February 21, 2006
  • multiple/hidden targets again, Alexander Frink, 17:42
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., John Graham-Cumming, 15:28
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., Paul D. Smith, 15:02
  • RE: have a problem mixing Make and java., Lawrence, Lynne, 14:41
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., Dave Hylands, 14:40
  • RE: Can u help me, Kris Thielemans, 14:12
  • Re: have a problem mixing Make and java., Greg Chicares, 12:55
  • have a problem mixing Make and java., richard t, 08:06
  • Can u help me, Robert Tellamalla, 08:06
• February 20, 2006
  • Re: how to delete suffix rules while retaining pattern rules?, Paul D. Smith, 21:22
  • how to delete suffix rules while retaining pattern rules?, Robert P. J. Day, 14:57
• February 19, 2006
  • GNU make 3.81rc1 released -- please test., psmith, 23:25
• February 18, 2006
  • Re: Make output in German, Paul D. Smith, 15:56
  • Make output in German, Chris Felton, 12:28
  • Re: "targetted" pattern rules, Paul D. Smith, 12:13
  • Re: "targetted" pattern rules, Greg Chicares, 11:56
  • "targetted" pattern rules, Helge Avlesen, 08:01
• February 17, 2006
  • help, Robert Tellamalla, 10:17
  • Re: Remaking when some "parameter" changes value, John Graham-Cumming, 08:37
• February 16, 2006
  • Re: Make -l on AIX broken, Paul D. Smith, 14:19
  • Make -l on AIX broken, Mathoora, Ashvin, 09:14
• February 15, 2006
  • Re: $(MAKE) query, Paul D. Smith, 15:50
  • $(MAKE) query, amit kumar, 14:13
  • RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, Paul D. Smith, 13:31
  • RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 12:56
  • Re: $(call ...) versus (macro-name ...), Ken Smith, 11:40
  • RE: GNU make 3.79.1 help required .... -j option is ignored, Norman Wilson, 05:08
• February 14, 2006
  • Re: GNU make 3.79.1 help required .... -j option is ignored, Greg Chicares, 17:47
  • Re: GNU make 3.79.1 help required .... -j option is ignored, Paul D. Smith, 17:26
  • GNU make 3.79.1 help required .... -j option is ignored, amit kumar, 15:28
  • Re: $(call ...) versus (macro-name ...), John Graham-Cumming, 13:53
• February 13, 2006
  • Re: Automatic build time inclusion, Martin Willers, 15:20
  • RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, Paul D. Smith, 13:44
  • Any Makefile examples available - Preprocess files, Jaye Speaks, 13:37
  • RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 13:09
  • RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, Paul D. Smith, 12:29
  • RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 11:59
  • RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, Paul D. Smith, 11:28
  • RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 11:18
  • Re: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, Paul D. Smith, 11:01
  • Re: commenting a *make* directive that is a *shell* command, Paul D. Smith, 10:56
  • Re: commenting a *make* directive that is a *shell* command, Robert P. J. Day, 10:55
  • Re: commenting a *make* directive that is a *shell* command, Greg Chicares, 10:48
  • Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 09:10
  • commenting a *make* directive that is a *shell* command, Robert P. J. Day, 08:51
  • Re: $(call ...) versus (macro-name ...), Paul D. Smith, 08:39
  • $(call ...) versus (macro-name ...), Robert P. J. Day, 06:18
  • Re: Remaking when some "parameter" changes value, Paul D. Smith, 00:37
  • Re: Remaking when some "parameter" changes value, Greg Chicares, 00:25
• February 12, 2006
  • Re: Automatic build time inclusion, Nick Patavalis, 18:55
  • Remaking when some "parameter" changes value, Nick Patavalis, 18:54
  • Re: Automatic build time inclusion, Eric West, 18:37
  • Automatic build time inclusion, Martin Willers, 15:23
  • Re: any function less ominous than "warning"?, Paul D. Smith, 10:31
  • Re: do PHONY targets guarantee an order on dependency processing?, Paul D. Smith, 09:33
  • any function less ominous than "warning"?, Robert P. J. Day, 09:08
  • Re: supporting multiple independent checkouts of a project, Robert P. J. Day, 08:29
  • Re: supporting multiple independent checkouts of a project, Greg Chicares, 08:26
  • Re: supporting multiple independent checkouts of a project, Nick Patavalis, 07:58
  • supporting multiple independent checkouts of a project, Robert P. J. Day, 07:32
  • Re: do PHONY targets guarantee an order on dependency processing?, Robert P. J. Day, 05:30
• February 11, 2006
  • Re: do PHONY targets guarantee an order on dependency processing?, Paul D. Smith, 17:20
  • do PHONY targets guarantee an order on dependency processing?, Robert P. J. Day, 15:38
• February 10, 2006
  • Re: any good development-oriented includable .mk files out there?, Greg Chicares, 12:17
  • any good development-oriented includable .mk files out there?, Robert P. J. Day, 09:26
• February 06, 2006
  • Re: -W and VPATH bug 15341, Paul D. Smith, 11:25
  • -W and VPATH bug 15341, Norman Wilson, 06:12
  • Re: "No targets" message with pattern rule, John Graham-Cumming, 03:12
• February 05, 2006
  • Re: "No targets" message with pattern rule, August Karlstrom, 22:35
  • Re: "No targets" message with pattern rule, Nick Patavalis, 17:47
  • Re: "No targets" message with pattern rule, August Karlstrom, 17:17
  • Re: "No targets" message with pattern rule, Nick Patavalis, 14:57
  • "No targets" message with pattern rule, August Karlstrom, 14:46
  • Re: Traversal Makefile?, Nick Patavalis, 13:22
  • Traversal Makefile?, Ken Klein, 10:18
• February 04, 2006
  • Re: profiling, what takes so long?, Torsten Mohr, 17:25
• February 02, 2006
  • Re: passing quoted variables to submakes, psmith, 17:52
  • Re: profiling, what takes so long?, Dave Hylands, 13:15
  • Re: profiling, what takes so long?, Paul D. Smith, 13:14
  • Re: profiling, what takes so long?, Brendan Heading, 11:18
• February 01, 2006
  • Re: basic problem with eval, Johan Bezem, 23:50
  • Re: profiling, what takes so long?, Johan Bezem, 23:45
  • basic problem with eval, Xavier Marichal, 23:18
  • Re: profiling, what takes so long?, Dan Kegel, 18:34
  • Re: profiling, what takes so long?, Paul D. Smith, 18:21
  • Re: profiling, what takes so long?, Brendan Heading, 18:18
  • profiling, what takes so long?, Torsten Mohr, 15:56
  • Re: Advanced Auto-Dependency Generation. A slight improvement., Nick Patavalis, 04:21

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc