Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

help-make (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Fri Mar 31 2006 11:49:05 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• March 31, 2006
  • Re: Interrupted System Call EINTR on Solaris, Paul D. Smith, 11:49
  • Interrupted System Call EINTR on Solaris, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 11:05
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Paul D. Smith, 10:23
  • Re: Recursive dependencies, Paul D. Smith, 10:19
  • Recursive dependencies, Rodrigo de Salvo Braz, 10:14
  • RE: what is &&, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM, 07:14
  • what is &&, Angel Tsankov, 06:49
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Angel Tsankov, 02:35
• March 30, 2006
  • Re: Pattern Rules, Paul D. Smith, 21:40
  • Pattern Rules, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 16:31
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Paul D. Smith, 15:25
  • Re: Dynamic libraries, Paul D. Smith, 15:22
  • RE: Dynamic libraries, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 15:12
  • Dynamic libraries, Montenegro, Alejandro, 15:09
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Angel Tsankov, 13:32
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Paul D. Smith, 10:12
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Angel Tsankov, 09:58
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Paul D. Smith, 08:53
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Angel Tsankov, 03:02
• March 29, 2006
  • Re: quoting $$ (or something completely different?), Paul D. Smith, 18:23
  • Re: make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Paul D. Smith, 18:23
  • quoting $$ (or something completely different?), Tom Bachmann, 16:18
  • make 3.81rc2: automatic variables strip leading "./", Angel Tsankov, 16:10
  • RE: installation, Paul D. Smith, 13:13
  • RE: installation, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 13:10
  • Re: installation, Paul D. Smith, 13:09
  • installation, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 10:48
  • Re: ifeq and ifneq and/or help, Paul D. Smith, 09:56
  • Re: Multiple jobs option doesn´t work after some time, Paul D. Smith, 08:53
  • ifeq and ifneq and/or help, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 08:47
  • RE: Multiple jobs option doesn´t work after s ome time, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 08:13
  • Multiple jobs option doesn´t work after some tim e, Michael Stather, 07:55
• March 28, 2006
  • RE: How to use gmsl, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 16:40
  • Re: How to use gmsl, John Graham-Cumming, 16:23
  • How to use gmsl, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 16:16
  • Re: How to reduce load time, Paul D. Smith, 14:45
  • How to reduce load time, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 14:36
  • Re: generating multiple object files -- the current solution, Paul D. Smith, 13:54
  • generating multiple object files -- the current solution, Robert P. J. Day, 13:43
  • Re: Is there a rule counter?, Paul D. Smith, 09:45
  • Is there a rule counter?, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:39
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Paul D. Smith, 08:44
  • RE: Why does one work ant the other doesn't $(foreach, Paul D. Smith, 08:21
  • RE: Why does one work ant the other doesn't $(foreach, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 06:32
  • Re: how to methodically generate a set of rules?, Robert P. J. Day, 06:23
  • Re: how to methodically generate a set of rules?, mathieu lacage, 06:13
  • Re: how to methodically generate a set of rules?, Robert P. J. Day, 05:55
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Chris Chiasson, 00:18
• March 27, 2006
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Paul D. Smith, 22:24
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Paul D. Smith, 22:21
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Chris Chiasson, 22:11
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Aditya Kher, 21:39
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Paul D. Smith, 21:35
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Chris Chiasson, 20:28
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Chris Chiasson, 20:14
  • Re: how to methodically generate a set of rules?, Nick Patavalis, 19:42
  • Re: how to methodically generate a set of rules?, Nick Patavalis, 19:32
  • Why does one work ant the other doesn't $(foreach, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 17:01
  • Re: Initializing variables in rules, Greg Chicares, 16:46
  • Re: Why does make behave like this?, Dave Hylands, 16:25
  • RE: Initializing variables in rules, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 16:11
  • how to methodically generate a set of rules?, Robert P. J. Day, 14:36
  • Re: Why does make behave like this?, Paul D. Smith, 12:52
  • Re: loop on the command side help please, Paul D. Smith, 12:32
  • Initializing variables in rules, Thierry Lam, 12:25
  • RE: Can I have a variable and target the same name, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 12:24
  • Re: kind of double depency, Sébastien BARTHÉ LEMY, 12:16
  • Re: Why does make behave like this?, Aditya Kher, 00:26
  • Re: Why does make behave like this?, Aditya Kher, 00:21
• March 25, 2006
  • Why does make behave like this?, Rodrigo de Salvo Braz, 22:34
  • FYI: distmake 0.3 annoncement, Ron Chen, 22:34
• March 23, 2006
  • loop on the command side help please, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 11:30
• March 22, 2006
  • Re: Documentation, Nick Patavalis, 21:20
  • Re: Documentation, Paul D. Smith, 11:33
  • Documentation, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 11:19
  • RE: Can I have a variable and target the same name, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:53
  • Re: Can I have a variable and target the same name, Greg Chicares, 09:50
  • Re: Can I have a variable and target the same name, Paul D. Smith, 09:42
  • Can I have a variable and target the same name, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:25
• March 21, 2006
  • Re: one makes many, Paul D. Smith, 07:18
  • RE: kind of double depency, Norman Wilson, 05:27
  • one makes many, Chris Chiasson, 04:13
• March 20, 2006
  • Re: Implicitly specifying target directories, Greg Chicares, 21:36
  • Re: kind of double depency, Greg Chicares, 16:59
  • Re: does + have special meaning in this statement, Paul D. Smith, 15:40
  • does + have special meaning in this statement, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 15:38
  • Re: kind of double depency, Paul D. Smith, 15:29
  • Re: Handling make errors, Paul D. Smith, 15:28
  • RE: kind of double depency, Lawrence, Lynne, 15:16
  • kind of double depency, Sébastien BARTH ÉLEMY, 15:07
  • Handling make errors, Rani Pinchuk, 15:07
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 13:06
  • RE: Must be very simple, Paul D. Smith, 12:56
  • Re: Implicitly specifying target directories, Paul D. Smith, 12:36
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 12:29
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 12:21
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 11:58
  • RE: Must be very simple, Paul D. Smith, 11:58
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 11:55
  • Re: 3.8.1rc1/2, Paul D. Smith, 11:55
  • Re: help: makefile: directory rules, Greg Chicares, 11:51
  • Implicitly specifying target directories, EXT-Pennington, Dale K, 11:45
  • RE: Must be very simple, Paul D. Smith, 11:38
  • Re: help: makefile: directory rules, Paul D. Smith, 11:35
  • RE: Must be very simple, Paul D. Smith, 11:29
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 11:19
  • RE: Must be very simple, Paul D. Smith, 11:13
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 11:07
  • RE: Must be very simple, Paul D. Smith, 11:07
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 10:55
  • RE: Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 10:54
  • Re: Must be very simple, Paul D. Smith, 10:51
  • Must be very simple, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 10:30
  • GNU make 3.81rc2 has been released, Paul D. Smith, 08:38
  • Re: 3.8.1rc1/2, Greg Chicares, 08:17
  • 3.8.1rc1/2, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 07:25
• March 19, 2006
  • Re: make always rebuilds..., Paul D. Smith, 09:58
  • make always rebuilds..., ody13, 07:34
• March 18, 2006
  • Re: Chicken-n-the-egg: regen .d file w/ missing header, Jason Lunz, 10:36
• March 17, 2006
  • Re: Chicken-n-the-egg: regen .d file w/ missing header, Greg Chicares, 23:22
  • Chicken-n-the-egg: regen .d file w/ missing header, Matt England, 22:50
  • Re: My earlier message about core dump, Paul D. Smith, 09:16
  • How do I get the dependencies to print with an echo? From inside a define, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 08:35
  • My earlier message about core dump, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 07:40
  • core dump, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 07:27
• March 16, 2006
  • Re: help: makefile: directory rules, Paul Li, 23:12
  • Re: Macro/Template for Code Compilation, William Ahern, 23:10
  • Re: help: makefile: directory rules, Greg Chicares, 22:43
  • help: makefile: directory rules, paulur, 22:02
  • Re: Macro/Template for Code Compilation, Greg Chicares, 21:47
  • Macro/Template for Code Compilation, William Ahern, 18:31
  • Re: How can I see what is built with the eval, Paul D. Smith, 16:59
  • How can I see what is built with the eval, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 16:49
  • Re: Char to use as separator, Paul D. Smith, 15:24
  • Char to use as separator, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 15:12
  • Re: core dump of gmake v 3.80 hpux, Paul D. Smith, 15:00
  • I have a problem anyway, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 14:50
  • more infor for core dump, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 14:49
  • core dump of gmake v 3.80 hpux, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 14:46
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Ted Stern, 14:17
  • Re: gmsl and split, John Graham-Cumming, 14:14
  • gmsl and split, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 14:09
  • LOOKY LOOKY LOOKY I did it :), PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 11:16
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Jason Lunz, 11:00
  • Was eval Hierarchy, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 10:29
  • RE: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically GOT IT TO WORK :) :) :), PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:58
  • RE: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:58
  • Re: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, John Graham-Cumming, 09:55
  • Re: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, John Graham-Cumming, 09:49
  • RE: looking for help with auto creating rules with evalhierarchically GETTING SOMEWHERE NOW, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:48
  • RE: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:40
  • RE: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:32
  • Re: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, John Graham-Cumming, 09:29
  • RE: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:09
  • RE: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 09:03
  • Re: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, John Graham-Cumming, 08:49
  • Re: looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, Paul D. Smith, 08:48
  • looking for help with auto creating rules with eval hierarchically, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 08:40
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Paul D. Smith, 07:55
  • RE: question about Circular dependency, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 07:46
  • Re: question about Circular dependency, John Graham-Cumming, 07:44
  • question about Circular dependency, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 07:36
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, John Graham-Cumming, 03:50
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Aditya Kher, 02:28
  • Re: use of wildcard function recursively, Chris Chiasson, 02:24
  • use of wildcard function recursively, Aditya Kher, 01:20
• March 15, 2006
  • Re: What is wrong with this, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 17:12
  • RE: What is wrong with this, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 16:33
  • RE: What is wrong with this, Paul D. Smith, 16:17
  • RE: What is wrong with this, Paul D. Smith, 16:14
  • RE: What is wrong with this, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 16:09
  • RE: What is wrong with this, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 15:54
  • Re: What is wrong with this, Paul D. Smith, 15:10
  • What is wrong with this, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 15:02
  • RE: is this list active, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 12:36
  • Re: is this list active, John Graham-Cumming, 12:32
  • is this list active, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 11:54
• March 14, 2006
  • Re: How to preserve $-containing terms in an expanded variable (with call)?, Paul D. Smith, 12:19
  • Re: How to preserve $-containing terms in an expanded variable (with call)?, Dimitry Golubovsky, 07:25
  • Re: How to preserve $-containing terms in an expanded variable (with call)?, John Graham-Cumming, 04:18
• March 13, 2006
  • How to preserve $-containing terms in an expanded variable (with call)?, Dimitry Golubovsky, 07:00
• March 11, 2006
  • Re: Conditionally run "-include" in a rule?, Dave Hylands, 22:14
  • Re: Conditionally run "-include" in a rule?, Matt England, 15:35
  • Re: Make Install, Paul D. Smith, 15:23
  • Re: Conditionally run "-include" in a rule?, Matt England, 15:13
  • Make Install, zak shapiro, 12:18
  • Re: Conditionally run "-include" in a rule?, Paul D. Smith, 12:13
  • Re: help segmentation fault make, Brendan Heading, 08:43
• March 10, 2006
  • Re: make not setting SCCS-retrieved .sh files executable, Philip Guenther, 23:09
  • make not setting SCCS-retrieved .sh files executable, Peter Welte, 20:35
  • Re: Conditionally run "-include" in a rule?, Greg Chicares, 17:04
  • Re: help segmentation fault make, Greg Chicares, 16:04
  • Re: help segmentation fault make, Paul D. Smith, 16:03
  • Conditionally run "-include" in a rule?, Matt England, 08:47
• March 09, 2006
  • help segmentation fault make, Jesús Velazquez, 18:28
  • Re: make: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop., Jason Lunz, 12:58
  • newbie needs help with define and eval, Chris Chiasson, 09:24
• March 08, 2006
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Matt England, 14:10
  • Re: how does Make process command sections before passing to the shell, Greg Chicares, 12:56
  • Re: how does Make process command sections before passing to the shell, Paul D. Smith, 12:08
  • how does Make process command sections before passing to the shell, Andrew Ferguson, 11:37
  • Re: Any active maintainers using MinGW/MSYS?, J. Grant, 09:48
  • RE: Make rebuilds when it is not necessary, Rupal Desai, 09:48
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Greg Chicares, 09:41
  • Re: make: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop., Mathieu Lacage, 09:26
  • Re: Any active maintainers using MinGW/MSYS?, Eli Zaretskii, 00:53
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Earnie Boyd, 00:52
• March 07, 2006
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Matt England, 22:59
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Matt England, 22:32
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Greg Chicares, 22:14
  • Re: make: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop., Paul D. Smith, 22:03
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Matt England, 21:51
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Greg Chicares, 21:46
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Matt England, 20:53
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Paul D. Smith, 20:22
  • Re: Any active maintainers using MinGW/MSYS?, Paul D. Smith, 19:59
  • Any active maintainers using MinGW/MSYS?, Matt England, 19:18
  • Re: make: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop., Ted Stern, 19:06
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Eli Zaretskii, 19:06
  • Re: make-3.81rc1 mingw not failing on 'g++ -M' error, Eli Zaretskii, 19:06
  • Re: make-3.81rc1 mingw not failing on 'g++ -M' error, Matt England, 15:38
  • Re: make: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop., mathieu lacage, 14:56
  • Re: make: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop., Ted Stern, 14:45
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Paul D. Smith, 14:45
  • Re: Make rebuilds when it is not necessary, Ted Stern, 14:23
  • Re: make-3.81rc1 mingw not failing on 'g++ -M' error, Matt England, 14:15
  • make-3.81rc1 mingw not failing on 'g++ -M' error, Matt England, 13:23
  • make: *** virtual memory exhausted. Stop., Mathieu Lacage, 09:49
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Matt England, 09:41
• March 06, 2006
  • Re: Make rebuilds when it is not necessary, Dave Hylands, 16:45
  • Re: Make rebuilds when it is not necessary, Paul D. Smith, 16:02
  • Make rebuilds when it is not necessary, Rupal Desai, 15:21
• March 05, 2006
  • Re: make-3.81-rc1 build error, msys 1.0.11, seg fault, Matt England, 22:35
  • Re: make-3.81-rc1 build error, msys 1.0.11, seg fault, Paul D. Smith, 22:15
  • make-3.81-rc1 build error, msys 1.0.11, seg fault, Matt England, 19:05
  • Re: (no subject), Paul D. Smith, 15:49
• March 04, 2006
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Eli Zaretskii, 21:38
  • Re: make3.81-beta4 mingw not failing on error?, Paul D. Smith, 13:34
  • looking for example build structure for linux embedded system, Robert P. J. Day, 10:42
  • Re: make-3.81rc1 results, Paul D. Smith, 09:19
  • (no subject), Tlwarre, 08:59
  • Re: How can I call "notdir" on a file name that contains spaces?, Greg Chicares, 06:04
  • Re: How can I call "notdir" on a file name that contains spaces?, Paul D. Smith, 05:46
  • RE: How can I call "notdir" on a file name that contains spaces?, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 04:22
  • Re: make-3.81rc1 results, Martin Sebor, 03:42
• March 03, 2006
  • Re: double-colon rules and multi-arch builds, Greg Chicares, 18:44
  • Re: How can I call "notdir" on a file name that contains spaces?, John Graham-Cumming, 14:04
  • Re: confused about double-colon "terminal" rules, John Graham-Cumming, 13:55
  • Re: confused about double-colon "terminal" rules, Paul D. Smith, 13:28
• March 02, 2006
  • double-colon rules and multi-arch builds, Robert P. J. Day, 16:53
  • confused about double-colon "terminal" rules, Robert P. J. Day, 15:31
  • How can I call "notdir" on a file name that contains spaces?, Eric Hanchrow, 04:00
  • Re: make-3.81rc1 results, Paul D. Smith, 01:14
  • Re: make-3.81rc1 - Cygwin bugs, test errors, Paul D. Smith, 00:37

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc