[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Aspell-user] Re: Is the native Aspell/WIN32 port a lot faster
From: |
Doug Nelson |
Subject: |
[Aspell-user] Re: Is the native Aspell/WIN32 port a lot faster |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:05:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
Does anyone know if the aspell colors can be changed, and if so, how?
The colors seem to be locked into colors 0 (background) and 7
(foreground). I cannot change the RBG value of the colors since I am
launching aspell from within another application that needs colors 0 and
7 to be very similar and so the aspell presentation is not very
readable. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Doug Nelson wrote:
I tried this and it is a lot faster - typically around 2 seconds
(instead of 10).
Doug Nelson wrote:
Is the native Aspell/WIN32 port supposed to be a lot faster than
simply invoking aspell via a batch file? If it is faster, is the
time savings mainly due to not having to "compile" the perl code
every time it's invoked? Is my question making sense? Every time I
call aspell (either in a command prompt or from a cobol application
on windows), it takes at least 10 seconds just to present the
interface and I am using pretty good hardware.
------
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and
may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this
information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and
delete the original message from your mail system.