[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time...
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time... |
Date: |
Tue, 03 May 2005 13:15:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
* David Kastrup (2005-05-02) writes:
> Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> * David Kastrup (2005-05-01) writes:
>>
>>> Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Installation for XEmacs succeeds but after starting XEmacs, the new
>>>> installation is shadowed by the old one. Here is the start of the
>>>> output of `list-load-path-shadows':
>>>>
>>>> /usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages/lisp/auctex/tex-bar hides
>>>> /usr/share/xemacs21/site-packages/lisp/auctex/tex-bar
>>>
>>> WHAT?!?
>>>
>>> Taking a look at the XEmacs in Ubuntu, I see that xemacs-packages is
>>> _before_ site-packages in the search order.
>>>
>>> What idiocy is that? This is completely insane. Whoever at Debian is
>>> responsible for that ought to be shot. XEmacs in Fedora does not have
>>> this sick, sick load order. Seems to be a Debian special.
>>
>> Yep. It seems that this was done at configuration time. At least
>> this is what the ./configure string shown in `M-x report-xemacs-bug
>> RET' suggests.
>
> Did you send the report off to Debian then?
I needed some time to look for already filed bug reports on this
matter and for finding a suitable reference in XEmacs' Lispref manual.
You can find my additions to a formerly filed report at
<URL:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=151900>.
>> At least I now get a popup buffer after starting XEmacs with `xemacs
>> -q -no-site-file -l auctex-setup.el' telling me this:
>
> Uh, auctex-setup.el?
That's the file I mentioned earlier which activates AUCTeX and does
nothing else. Next time I'll use `emacs -q -no-site-file -eval
"(require 'tex-site)"'.
>> (1) (warning/warning) Autoload error in:
>> /usr/share/xemacs21/site-packages/lisp/auctex/auto-autoloads:
>> Symbol's value as variable is void: TeX-fold-keymap
>
> Hmpf. What are we doing with that? Doc string formatting or what?
> If that is the case, maybe one has to do a doc-string-less automode
> cookie, like I did with the toolbarx-install or so.
I don't see how this is related to the doc string. auto-autoloads.el
contains the whole `define-minor-mode' call which chokes on the
variable used for the keymap. I don't know if this is a common
problem on XEmacs but grepping through the xemacs-packages directory
on my system I found three spots where including the
`define-minor-mode' call is inhibited. Here is one:
,----[ diff-mode.el.gz ]
| ;; XEmacs hack: autoload a dummy autoload instead of a minor mode
| ;;;###autoload(autoload 'diff-minor-mode "diff-mode" nil t)
| (define-minor-mode diff-minor-mode
`----
--
Ralf
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/01
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/01
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/01
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/02
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/02
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time...,
Ralf Angeli <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/04
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/05
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/05
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/05
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/05
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/04
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., Davide G. M. Salvetti, 2005/05/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Running out of time..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/04