[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Packaging
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Packaging |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:50:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
> It seems that the preview-latex install base doesn't gain much after
> the inclusion in AUCTeX due to packagers having problems with it,
> see
> e.g. <URL:http://mid.gmane.org/address@hidden>.
>
> At least in FreeBSD's port it is enabled.
I guess that we should probably recommend the "--without-texmf-dir"
way of doing things for everybody that does not want to ship a
combined Emacs/TeX distribution. That makes it easy to switch between
different TeX engines. Of course, it requires that the TEXINPUTS
manipulations do the trick. But I think they should.
There is a problem with preview-TeX-style-dir, though: it requires the
correct kpathsea character to be known at compile time. We should
remove that character from the string again, I think.
We need to get this fixed, I guess. One possibility would be to use
TeX-kpathsea-path-delimiter when it is a string, another is to expand
the file name to absolute and check whether it has a colon in second
position (in which case using ";" as a delimiter would be a reasonable
assumption).
If there already _is_ a ":" or ";" character there at the end (maybe
from a previous installation), we can of course leave it there. But
other than that, we should not put it there in the first place.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Packaging,
David Kastrup <=