Re: [AUCTeX-devel] A few patches for AUCTeX

[Leo Liu]

Thanks Tassilo.

On 2013-04-04 15:27 +0800, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>> [1. text/x-patch; 
>> 0001-Fix-a-bug-in-LaTeX-outline-level-for-customised-outl.patch]
>
> Could you please provide some insights to when this patch makes a
> difference?

It is all very vague for me. But
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.auctex.bugs/1648 seems to say
something about the current behaviour for example if outline-regexp is
customised, org-narrow-to-subtree would not work.

>> [3. text/x-patch; 0003-Fix-a-bug-causing-Invalid-face-reference-quote.patch]
>
> When do you get the invalid face reference?  I've tried setting
>
> (setq font-latex-user-keyword-classes
>       '(("shadow-hidden" (("hide" "{"))
>        '((((class color) (min-colors 88) (background light))
>           :background "darkseagreen2")
>          (((class color) (min-colors 88) (background dark))
>           :background "darkolivegreen")
>          (((class color) (min-colors 16) (background light))
>           :background "darkseagreen2")
>          (((class color) (min-colors 16) (background dark))
>           :background "darkolivegreen")
>          (((class color) (min-colors 8))
>           :background "green" :foreground "black")
>          (t :inverse-video t)) command)
>       ("shadow-mycomment" (("mycomment" "{")) shadow command)
>       ("shadow-comment" (("comment" "{")) shadow command)))
>
> so that I both specify a face using a face specification and using its
> name, but I don't see any difference (nor errors) with or without your
> patch.

I have a recipe here to reproduce the bug:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.auctex.devel/2466

HTH,
Leo