[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:53:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.9.0; emacs 29.0.50 |
Christopher Dimech <dimech@gmx.com> writes:
> Have seen that the built-in tex-mode and latex-mode have two powerful
> features: 1) the prettify-symbols-mode where things such as \alpha are
> displayed with the corresponding greek glyph symbol; and 2) the
> ability to reposition the height of superscripts and subscripts.
>
> For the two features, I seem to remember than the rendering proves to
> be superior in Auctex.
AUCTeX basically uses the prettify-symbols setup from the builtin latex
mode. I don't know what you mean with repositioning the height of
sub/superscripts. AUCTeX (font-latex.el) allows to fontify them as such
even on multiple levels, e.g., x^y^z.
> Could you see whether using the functionality from the Auctex
> implementation be used.
AUCTeX font-lock implementation heavily relies on the information
gathered by AUCTeX's parsing abilities and its style files, so I guess,
no.
Bye,
Tassilo
- AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/19
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, David Kastrup, 2022/09/19
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/20
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/20
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Christopher Dimech, 2022/09/20
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration,
Tassilo Horn <=
- Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Christopher Dimech, 2022/09/21
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Ikumi Keita, 2022/09/20
Re: AUCTeX and "builtin latex mode" integration, Uwe Brauer, 2022/09/20