Re: [AUCTeX] Re: auctex.el.in missing in snapshots

[Reiner Steib]

On Wed, May 11 2005, David Kastrup wrote:

> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
>> Nice.  I used TAGs like 20050511-a which doesn't work as it is.  Do
>> you see any problem with this modification of the sed expression?
>> -    '/^[-0-9]*$$/s//-D &/'
>> +    '/^\([0-9]*\)[-a-z]*$$/s//-D \1/'
>
> Well, it will stop the TAG=`date --iso` stuff from working, but as
> long as we are the only people thinking up TAG names, this should not
> matter too much.  What is the rationale behind it?

To allow appending "-a"..."-z" like in 20050511-a.

> Should the expression become something like
> '/^\([-0-9]*[0-9]\)[-a-z]*$$//-D \1/' instead, maybe?

You meant...
  '/^\([-0-9]*[0-9]\)[-a-z]*$$/s//-D \1/' probably?

Fine with me.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/