[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX] Re: Launching xdvi without prompt
From: |
Richard Lewis |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX] Re: Launching xdvi without prompt |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:32:14 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus Emacs (gnu/linux) |
Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
> There is no distinction between LaTeX and non-LaTeX commands. It's
> more like between commands AUCTeX knows and those it doesn't know.
> But this distinction is not consequently followed. There are quite a
> lot commands AUCTeX knows but which are colored with
> `font-latex-sedate-face'.
>
> With "commands" you are probably referring to the macro without its
> arguments. The "known" commands are fontified with
> `font-lock-keyword-face' and the "unkown" ones with
> `font-latex-sedate-face'.
> See (info "(auctex)Font Locking"); <-- Type `C-x C-e' here.
this page doesnt mention the difference between the 'sedated' commands
and the keyword commands, why does auctex make a distinction? (im not
complaining, just curious---I just set the sedate face to be
indistinguishable from the sedate one, but presumably someone must
find it useful)
- [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, Christophe FARGES, 2006/01/24
- Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, Ralf Angeli, 2006/01/24
- Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, Christophe FARGES, 2006/01/24
- Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, Ralf Angeli, 2006/01/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, Christophe FARGES, 2006/01/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, Ralf Angeli, 2006/01/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, Christophe FARGES, 2006/01/26
- Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, David Kastrup, 2006/01/26
- Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, Christophe FARGES, 2006/01/26
- [AUCTeX] Re: Launching xdvi without prompt,
Richard Lewis <=
Re: [AUCTeX] Launching xdvi without prompt, David Kastrup, 2006/01/24