[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros
From: |
Christian Stork |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:29:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:45:50PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Christian Stork <address@hidden> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:28:12PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > ...
> >> > Just an idea: Many of my macros have an enclosing \ensuremath{..}. I
> >> > often use these macros then in my text outside of $..$. It seems like a
> >> > great feature if preview-latex could offer an option to automatically
> >> > register these macros for preview.
> >> You can try \PreviewMacro[!]\ensuremath and see where this takes you.
> > Only satisfactory for the argumentless macros. But thanks anyway.
> > Generating them automatically seems like the best solution and might
> > even be feasible...
> For macros with arguments that happen to call \ensuremath?
No, less general, for the once of the form
\newcommand{\xyz}[N]{\ensuremath{....}}
> Not really. How should \ensuremath figure out just where its caller
> chose to have an argument and where not?
"Just" compile it as $\xyz...$.
--
Chris Stork <> Support eff.org! <> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cstork/
OpenPGP fingerprint: B08B 602C C806 C492 D069 021E 41F3 8C8D 50F9 CA2F
- [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros, Christian Stork, 2006/11/01
- Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros, David Kastrup, 2006/11/01
- Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros, Christian Stork, 2006/11/01
- Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros, David Kastrup, 2006/11/01
- Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros, Christian Stork, 2006/11/01
- Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros, David Kastrup, 2006/11/01
- Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros,
Christian Stork <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros, David Kastrup, 2006/11/01
- Re: [AUCTeX] Preview of non-math macros, Christian Stork, 2006/11/01