[AUCTeX] Re: Comment filling : I would like to make a contribution

[Vincent Belaïche]

Ralf Angeli a écrit :
> > *Please confirm your intention* :
> > do you object to my contribution ?
> > If yes, you seem however to see some need for unfillable sections, could 
> > you please tell me how I could make this function available in an 
> > acceptable manner, as I do need for it, and I am sure that other people 
> > may need for it too.
> >     
>
> I'd post the idea on the Emacs development list for discussion.
>
>   
Hello Ralph,

Just to fuel arguments into this discussion: the need is not only for 
EUPP. File-variables also are using comments that need to be handled as 
special sections without indentation.

EUPP uses the same philosophy as file-varables for preprocessor code 
delimitation, either an EUPP bock is a one-liner (as for the buffer 
first line -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*- file variable setting) or an EUPP 
block is a multi-liner (as for the end of buffer file variable setting
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% End:
)

So it would probably be good if there was some buffer local variable 
containig a list of delimitations conditions.
Each delimitation condition would be a itself a list or a vector with 
the following  information:
* usage: some symbol telling what this delimitation is for (that symbol 
could be file-variable or eupp)
* position in buffer : top | bottom | anywhere
* type of section : one-liner | multiliner
* delimitation regexps : (bol eol)  for a one-liner
                      (first-line-bol first-line-eol mid-line-bol 
mid-line-eol last-line-bol last-line-eol) for a multi-liner

Then all what I would need to use EUPP under AUCTeX would be to add to 
that list EUPP specific EUPP block delimitation information.

BR,
  Vincent.