[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] out comment every line
From: |
Lars Madsen |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] out comment every line |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:57:21 +0000 |
Here is a sample of what happens
(defun mytest ()
(interactive)
(let (
beg
end
(T 0.5)
)
(sit-for T)
(re-search-forward "{" nil t)
(sit-for T)
(goto-char (match-beginning 0))
(sit-for T)
(setq beg (point))
(sit-for T)
(forward-sexp)
(sit-for T)
(setq end (point))
(sit-for T)
(TeX-comment-region beg end)
(sit-for T)
(goto-char end)
)
)
Use it (in LaTeX-mode, and make sure the cursor is before the {)
{The things in themselves are what first give rise to reason, as is
proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural
reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
abstracts from all content of knowledge; in view of
these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
the key to understanding pure logic.
Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
understanding stands in need of our disjunctive
judgements. As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic,
in the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts from
all content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of,
in accordance with the principles of the employment of the
paralogisms, time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our
concepts can be treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal,
it must not be supposed that the objects in space and time are what
first give rise to the employment of pure reason.
The things in themselves are what first give rise to reason, as is
proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural
reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
abstracts from all content of knowledge; in view of
these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
the key to understanding pure logic.
Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
understanding stands in need of our disjunctive judgements. As is
shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic, in the case of the
discipline of natural reason, abstracts from all content of
knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of, in accordance
with the principles of the employment of the paralogisms, time. I
assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our concepts can be treated
like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be supposed
that the objects in space and time are what first give rise to the
employment of pure reason.
The things in themselves are what first give rise to reason, as is
proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural
reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
abstracts from all content of knowledge; in view of
these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
the key to understanding pure logic.
Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
understanding stands in need of our disjunctive
judgements. As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic, in
the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts from all
content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of, in
accordance with the principles of the employment of the paralogisms,
time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our concepts can be
treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be
these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
the key to understanding pure logic.
Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
understanding stands in need of our disjunctive
judgements. As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic, in
the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts from all
content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of, in
accordance with the principles of the employment of the paralogisms,
time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our concepts can be
treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be
these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
the key to understanding pure logic.
Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
understanding stands in need of our disjunctive
judgements. As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic, in
the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts from all
content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of, in
accordance with the principles of the employment of the paralogisms,
time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our concepts can be
treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be
supposed that the objects in space and time are what first give rise
to the employment of pure reason.}
/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/address@hidden / More information:
http://au.dk/en/address@hidden
________________________________________
From: address@hidden address@hidden on behalf of Lars Madsen address@hidden
Sent: 03 March 2015 15:43
To: Nicolas Richard
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] out comment every line
If I just to
(TeX-comment-region beg end)
(goto-char end)
I'm no longer at the end of the region. '% ' was added, so the region is now
longer.
I'm surely also missing something a lot easier here.
/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/address@hidden / More information:
http://au.dk/en/address@hidden
________________________________________
From: Nicolas Richard address@hidden
Sent: 03 March 2015 13:46
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: out comment every line
Lars Madsen <address@hidden> writes:
> If you run TeX-comment-region it will out comment the lines that are
> not blank. How can I tell it to comment everyline even if it is blank?
Since Tassilo answered this part already, let's look at the story :
> I'm using this in a macro that cleans up some 'strange' syntax into a
> more normal env based stuff. But I'd like to keep the original. So the
> macro detects the material, copies it, outcomments the region
At this point you know where the region ends, don't you ?
> and has
> to insert the converted stuff after the commented area.
>
> but after TeX-comment-region, the cursor may still be inside the
> commented area, so I need to get out.
So you could use it here.
I know I missed something because this was too obvious, but what did I
miss ?
--
Nicolas Richard
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex