[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:52:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
>> But we could test (executable-find "tex") top-level and message a big
>> fat warning if that returns nil, and we might also test `system-type'
>> to give a Mac-specific warning.
>
> Please find attached a patch.
Yes, looks good. I'd go with
(when (and (member ..)
(not (executable-find ...)))
...)
to have one layer of indentation less but that's just cosmetic. And I'd
test for `TeX-command' instead of hard-coding "tex". Or maybe even
better, just check the first word in `command' which has already been
expanded.
> Actually, my idea would be to do something like what we do with viewer
> binaries, ie add an optional entry to `TeX-command-list' elements with
> the name of the binary to be checked. And maybe define also a
> `TeX-command-list-builtin' to avoid problems. But I think to
> implement these ideas after rolling the new release.
Not sure if that's worth the trouble.
Bye,
Tassilo
- [AUCTeX] minor releases, giacomo boffi, 2015/10/16
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/16
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Mosè Giordano, 2015/10/16
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Mosè Giordano, 2015/10/16
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/16
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Mosè Giordano, 2015/10/16
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/16
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Mosè Giordano, 2015/10/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases,
Tassilo Horn <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, David Kastrup, 2015/10/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Mosè Giordano, 2015/10/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Mosè Giordano, 2015/10/19
- Re: [AUCTeX] minor releases, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/19