[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Avoid an unportable use of `$status' shell variable.
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Avoid an unportable use of `$status' shell variable. |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:37:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; ) |
At Tuesday 30 March 2010, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:54:03PM CEST:
> > * Makefile.am (path-check): Don't use the `$status' shell
> > variable in the target's rules, as it's special in Zsh
> > (equivalent to `$?', and readonly).
>
> Thanks! Will push.
>
> A very minor nit:
> > --- a/ChangeLog
> > +++ b/ChangeLog
> > @@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
> > 2010-03-30 Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
> >
> > + Avoid an unportable use of `$status' shell variable.
> > +
> > + * Makefile.am (path-check): Don't use the `$status' shell
> > variable
>
> For future patches, please remove the empty line between summary
> line and rest, it's customary to not have it in the ChangeLog, and
> only really needed in the git log, for nice 'git log --oneline'
> output.
You're right. This time I cut from the git commit message and copied
to the ChangeLog, rather than the other way round, as I usually do.
I'll try be more careful in the future.
> > + in the target's rules, as it's special in Zsh (equivalent to `$?',
> > + and readonly).
> > +
> > +2010-03-30 Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
> > +
>
> Another minor nit: I usually merge two patches on the same day to
> have only one author header line. Some projects do it this way,
> some the other. I think GCS recommends it.
And in fact there are some instances of this formatting in the
ChangeLog file, so I could have got it right without being told.
Sorry for the sloppy mistakes, I'll try do better in the future.
Thank you for the review and the advices,
Stefano
[PATCH 2/2] Avoid an unportable use of `$status' shell variable., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/03/30
Re: A couple of patches w.r.t. the target `path-check', Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/03/30