[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid possible false negatives in confh5.test.
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid possible false negatives in confh5.test. |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:09:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; ) |
At Friday 09 April 2010, Stefano Lattarini
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Avoid possible false negatives in confh5.test.
>
> * tests/confh5.test: Enable shell `errexit' flag, and bumped
> copyright years. Due to this change, any unexpected failure
> in calls to $ACLOCAL, $AUTOMAKE, $AUTOCONF or $AUTOHEADER, or
> a failure in grepping expected text in output files should now
> cause the whole test to fail.
>
Hello Ralf.
I see you applied the second (and last) patch in this series, but not
this first one (which is IMHO more important, since it helps to avoid
false negatives). Is this deliberate, or an oversight?
Regards,
Stefano
- [PATCH 1/2] Avoid possible false negatives in confh5.test., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/04/09
- [PATCH 2/2] Bugfix in confh5.test w.r.t. Solaris/Heirloom Sh., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/04/09
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Bugfix in confh5.test w.r.t. Solaris/Heirloom Sh., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/04/11
- [PATCH] Fix typos in comments in test confh5.test, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/04/11
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Bugfix in confh5.test w.r.t. Solaris/Heirloom Sh., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/04/17
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Bugfix in confh5.test w.r.t. Solaris/Heirloom Sh., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/04/20
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Bugfix in confh5.test w.r.t. Solaris/Heirloom Sh., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/04/20
- pending patches (was: [PATCH 2/2] Bugfix in confh5.test w.r.t. Solaris/Heirloom Sh.), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/04/20
- Re: pending patches (was: [PATCH 2/2] Bugfix in confh5.test w.r.t. Solaris/Heirloom Sh.), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/04/20
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Avoid possible false negatives in confh5.test.,
Stefano Lattarini <=