pending patches (was: [PATCH 2/2] Bugfix in confh5.test w.r.t. Solaris/Heirloom Sh.)

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Stefano,

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:14:51PM CEST:
> At Tuesday 20 April 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Thanks.  This and newer patches of yours should all be applied now.
> > Please speak up if I've overlooked any again.
> I guess that you're talking about overlooked typos/mistakes, not 
> "overlooked" patches, right? 

Right.

> In fact, I'm assuming that you haven't 
> answered the the recent still-pending patches' proposals basically for 
> lack of time;

Right.  Those where I've merged your patches looked all fine to me.
Sorry if that looked as if I wasn't honoring them properly.

> and assuming this, I avoid to send you ping messages, 
> which would be just annoying in this situation.  But if you think you 
> might have overlooked some messages/patches of mine, I could send 
> proper pings (which would be useful in this situation).

Well I know I've avoided the zsh patch set and the run_command and
check-testsuite stuff.  Other than that, with respect to stuff older
than today, I now see that I haven't addressed the distlinksbrk.test
and an instspc.test fix for Solaris sh.
 
> That said, yes, there is still a typo in the ChangeLog, and that was a 
> mistake of mine (I have it in my private git branch too). The attached 
> patch should fix it.

Thanks, I'm applying that.

> Sorry for this additional noise.

Don't worry.  My Delete key is very quick. ;-)

Cheers,
Ralf

> From 6516fd39c3c92f1a7d66906adbaf89fb3a99ede5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:26:28 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Typofix in older changelog entry.