[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond5.test spurious failure
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: cond5.test spurious failure |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Aug 2010 00:09:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
At Friday 06 August 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> FWIW, your patch worked 10+ times in a row for me, and no fails.
>
> I personally don't care which patch eventually "makes it"...
It seems it has been your one ;-). No big deal for me, either, and
thanks for the testing.
Regards,
Stefano
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, (continued)
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- cond5.test spurious failure (was: New auxiliary archive script), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure,
Stefano Lattarini <=
- [PATCH] Remove a race condition from test cond5.test (was: cond5.test spurious failure), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: cond5.test spurious failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/11
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/06
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/07
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/08
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/08
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2010/08/08
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/09
- Re: New auxiliary archive script, Peter Rosin, 2010/08/10