[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on merging patches
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: on merging patches |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Aug 2010 13:47:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
At Sunday 08 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Well, if it helps you, there is no need to maintain a linear
> history in the maint branch. You can also just merge your (fixed)
> patches from the branches where you have them, that is fine with
> me as well. No need to rebase or cherry-pick the patches if that
> would mean more work for you.
Good to know, I'll keep that in mind if I ever encounter a real
hurdle with my git workflow. For the moment, though, "git rebase"
and "git am -3" work like a charm.
> Does that make sense to you?
I think so :-)
Regards,
Stefano
- Re: [PATCHES] Bootstrap: Allow user overriding of $AUTOCONF and $PERL., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/08
- Re: [PATCHES] Bootstrap: Allow user overriding of $AUTOCONF and $PERL., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/08
- Re: [PATCHES] Bootstrap: Allow user overriding of $AUTOCONF and $PERL., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/08
- Re: [PATCHES] Bootstrap: Allow user overriding of $AUTOCONF and $PERL., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/08
- Re: [PATCHES] Bootstrap: Allow user overriding of $AUTOCONF and $PERL., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/08
- fake merges (was: [PATCHES] Bootstrap: Allow user overriding of $AUTOCONF and $PERL.), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/08
- Re: fake merges, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/08