Re: [PATCH 4/9] Warnings win over strictness in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.

[Stefano Lattarini]

Hello Ralf.

There's still a wart to be fixed before this patch series can be
committed ...

On Thursday 13 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:11:41PM CET:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > So, now with that said, I'm not sure whether I should approve this
> > > patch.  What do you think?
> > >
> > I think that you should, provided that I add the sanity check you
> > suggested above.
> 
> OK.
> 
Hmm...  Wait, this sanity check is OK only starting from [PATCH 7/9]
onward, as until then the 'handle_options()' subroutine still calls
'process_option_list()' multiple times (that's why the bug is still
present for AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS at this point).

So, OK to add the sanity check in [PATCH 7/9] (or in a new follow-up
patch to be placed between patches 7 and 8 in this series)?

Regards,
   Stefano