Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Explicit warning levels must always take precedence o

automake-patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Explicit warning levels must always take precedence o

From:	Stefano Lattarini
Subject:	Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Explicit warning levels must always take precedence over those implied by the strictness
Date:	Sat, 15 Jan 2011 15:37:17 +0100
User-agent:	KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )

Reference:
 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-01/msg00039.html>

I've now pushed this patch series (with all the due amendments)
to a new public branch 'warns-win-over-strictness' based off of
master (not latest master, but near enough).

I've not merged it to master yet, BTW.  Should I?

Regards,
   Stefano

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [PATCH 7/9] Warnings win over strictness in AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS., (continued)
- [PATCH 8/9] Update NEWS about the warnings-over-strictness precedence., Stefano Lattarini, 2011/01/04
- [PATCH 9/9] More checks on warnings/strictness precedence., Stefano Lattarini, 2011/01/04
- [PATCH] Update docs w.r.t. warning and strictness options., Stefano Lattarini, 2011/01/15
  - Re: [PATCH] Update docs w.r.t. warning and strictness options., Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/01/15
    - Re: [PATCH] Update docs w.r.t. warning and strictness options., Stefano Lattarini, 2011/01/15
    - Re: [PATCH] Update docs w.r.t. warning and strictness options., Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/01/15
    - docs: ensure example are separated with empty lines in the input (was: [PATCH] Update docs w.r.t. warning and strictness options.), Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/01/15
    - Re: [PATCH] Update docs w.r.t. warning and strictness options., Stefano Lattarini, 2011/01/15
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Explicit warning levels must always take precedence over those implied by the strictness, Stefano Lattarini <=
  - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Explicit warning levels must always take precedence over those implied by the strictness, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/01/15
    - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Explicit warning levels must always take precedence over those implied by the strictness, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/01/15

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Tests defs: new subroutine `skip' for test skipping.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Explicit warning levels must always take precedence over those implied by the strictness
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Update docs w.r.t. warning and strictness options.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Explicit warning levels must always take precedence over those implied by the strictness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread