Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} tests: more coverage on yacc/lex silent-rules, plus minor cleanups

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:38:55PM CET:
> > or add an XFAILing test that exposes this change?
> >
> Well, to make amend, I can add a bunch of tests verifying that the
> idiom holds for the whole lot of *FLAGS variables.  Attached is my
> attempt for YFLAGS.  Should I add the checks for the other *FLAGS
> variables in separate tests, or in the same one (properly renaming
> it then, obviously)?

Why not all in one test, since you don't need any extra tools to test
them.  specflg11.test comes to mind as name, although I'm sure you
won't like it.  ;-)

Thanks!
Ralf