[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:19:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:27:18AM -0700, David Everly wrote:
> I have been working to follow this. It seems however that I need
> dist_TESTS, but this seems to not work so perhaps I should do this
> instead:
>
> EXTRA_DIST = $(TESTS)
yes, that is fine. One nit about style:
I would rather use
dist_check_SCRIPTS = $(TESTS)
Or perhaps the other way round. Let me give a more general example;
perhaps some of the tests are compiled programs, some are built
stripts and some are distributed scripts. Then you would have:
check_PROGRAMS = foo bar
foo_SOURCES = foo.c
bar_SOURCES = bar.c baz.c
nodist_check_SCRIPTS = this
# this is created from this.in by configure
dist_check_SCRIPTS = that another
TESTS = $(check_PROGRAMS) $(nodist_check_SCRIPTS) $(dist_check_SCRIPTS)
Have a nice day,
Stepan Kasal
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, (continued)
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/08
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/10
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/10
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/10