Re[2]: [avr-chat] Storing table in flash

[Kreyl]

    Hi!

You wrote Sunday, January 13, 2008, 1:47:54 AM:

> The table defined above is stored in RAM, not flash (although obviously
> the initialisers are stored in flash), and thus takes up lots of 
> valuable ram space.  The routines from avrlibc are much more space 
> efficient (no tables at all), but are much slower, since they handle a
> single bit at a time.  I've included routines below that use 256-entry
> lookup tables in flash,

  Thanks a lot, David! Very handy answer!

 
                                          Best regards,
                                                        Kreyl

                                          mailto: address@hidden
                                             ICQ: 171094105