[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug
From: |
David Kelly |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:36:31 -0600 |
On Nov 20, 2008, at 1:51 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
I'm sorry you seem to had such problems with the tools. There are
many other people who have never run across such difficulties, or at
least had got their issues resolved.
I agree with David (Van Horn) that AVR Studio and JTAG ICE MkII
can't always be trusted. Unfortunately that's a common problem with
development tools. Compared to other tools the AVR tools are not so
bad, I think. And as far as I know the other tools don't have Joerg.
CodeWarrior lied to me yesterday. Said the contents of a variable did
not change when I knew it had. The contents of its address were as
expected but the symbolic value had the previous value.
--
David Kelly N4HHE, address@hidden
========================================================================
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, (continued)
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Marge Coahran, 2008/11/19
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, David Kelly, 2008/11/19
- RE: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Weddington, Eric, 2008/11/19
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/11/19
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, David VanHorn, 2008/11/19
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/11/19
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, David VanHorn, 2008/11/19
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/11/19
- RE: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Weddington, Eric, 2008/11/19
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, jan, 2008/11/20
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug,
David Kelly <=
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, David VanHorn, 2008/11/20
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Peter LaDow, 2008/11/20
- Re: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Peter LaDow, 2008/11/20
- RE: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Weddington, Eric, 2008/11/19
RE: [avr-chat] JTAG Debug, larry barello, 2008/11/19
[avr-chat] JTAG Debug, Peter LaDow, 2008/11/20