[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, o
From: |
Mike Panetta |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?) |
Date: |
14 May 2003 12:50:44 -0400 |
A: I already did that.
B: I am not using the variables you mentioned yet, and they are not
involved in the code that I am having problems with.
I have read the FAQ (many times, its even where I got the basis for my
i2c code for this project from), and I know what volatile is for.
The problem I am having is GCC is seemingly IGNORING the return value of
a function I am calling. Why is it doing that? That is what I need
help with.
Thanks,
Mike
Wondering if anyone is actually reading his emails before pushing him at
the FAQ...
On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 12:17, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> Mike Panetta <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > If someone could help me understand my error, I would be greatly
> > appreciated.
>
> Why didn't you follow Keith's advise, and looked into the FAQ? You'll
> certainly want to declare at least one of your variables to be
> "volatile", namely SPIByteCounter, but maybe more -- please try to
> read and understand the FAQ. It would have saved you hours.
>
> In case you don't know:
>
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/avr-libc/doc/avr-libc-user-manual/FAQ.html
>
> --
> J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
> address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
>
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
- [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour..., Mike Panetta, 2003/05/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour..., Keith Gudger, 2003/05/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Joerg Wunsch, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?),
Mike Panetta <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Keith Gudger, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspectcompiler?, optimization error?), Larry Barello, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspectcompiler?, optimization error?), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Extremely confusing behaviour... (Suspectcompiler?,optimization error?), Ralph Mason, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (Suspect compiler?, optimization error?), Joerg Wunsch, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailed explanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailedexplanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), Larry Barello, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailedexplanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), Mike Panetta, 2003/05/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Extremly confusing behaviour... (more detailed explanation of error, believe me its not a volatile thing), E. Weddington, 2003/05/14