[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!
From: |
Björn Haase |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips! |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 20:40:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
> I'm not familiar with the test suite, and I'm curious: Where do these
> "nested functions" tests come from? That's not a C language feature. Is
> it C++?
>
> Eric
There is an extension to the c-language that is supposed to be supported by
all gcc targets. The idea is to support functions inside functions so that
e.g. something like
int
foo3 ( int func(int), int a)
{ return a + a * func (27);
}
void
foo (int a, int b)
{
int
foo2 (int c)
{ return c + b;
}
return foo3 (&foo2, a);
}
is considered to be legal code for gcc. The avr port does presently lack
support for this extension.
Yours,
Björn
- Re: [Fwd: AW: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!], E. Weddington, 2005/03/01
- Re: [Fwd: AW: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!], Björn Haase, 2005/03/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, E. Weddington, 2005/03/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!,
Björn Haase <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, E. Weddington, 2005/03/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, Russell Shaw, 2005/03/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, Rolf Ebert, 2005/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, E. Weddington, 2005/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, Rolf Ebert, 2005/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, Björn Haase, 2005/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, Rolf Ebert, 2005/03/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2005/03/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Improving in leaps and skips!, Jeff Barlow, 2005/03/13