[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect?
|
From: |
Daniel Kruszyna |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:40:05 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:39:03PM -0800, Jeff Barlow wrote:
> address@hidden wrote:
>
> >So what happens if we get interrupt between 69 and 70? And that interrupt
> >disables interrupts?
>
> I would claim that an ISR that returns without enabling
> interrupts is _broken_.
I can't see how this would happen, since reti always sets I to 1.
-- Daniel
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect?, (continued)
RE: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect?, HutchinsonAndy, 2005/03/06
Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect?, HutchinsonAndy, 2005/03/06
Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect?, HutchinsonAndy, 2005/03/07
Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect?, Jeff Barlow, 2005/03/07