[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: [avr-gcc-list] update on the last issue
From: |
Haase Bjoern (PT-BEU/EMT) * |
Subject: |
AW: [avr-gcc-list] update on the last issue |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:32:48 +0200 |
Hi,
Expect long long support to be *extremely* inefficient for AVR. IIRC, e.g.,
long long adds are implemented by a library function written in C that will add
one bit at a time ... The back-end does not supply any support for using long
longs so anything we have at the moment is the generic support of GCC's libgcc2.
Yours,
Björn
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden Im Auftrag von David Gesswein
Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2005 20:53
An: address@hidden
Betreff: Re: [avr-gcc-list] update on the last issue
Haven't played enough with the GCC avr port to have direct knowledge of
long long in it but these should help:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Long-Long.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/avr-libc-dev/2004-09/msg00038.html
>
> Hi,
> I did a little bit more of search and figured that if i use the long
> long for my X, Y coordinates and the sums, I should be able to handle
> extremely large numbers. But now When i do that, it still give me
> incorrect results. Even when i try to assign them those high values
> directly, it fails!!!!
>
...
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
- AW: [avr-gcc-list] update on the last issue,
Haase Bjoern (PT-BEU/EMT) * <=