Re: AW: [avr-gcc-list] Double desirability

[Parthasaradhi Nayani]

<address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> I have doubts, whether one could succeed in
> realizing similar efficiency with plain C functions.
> However, one might stand chances to succeed when
> using inline assembly.

Hello Bjoern,

Our GCC compiler is supposed to produce really tight
code with option 's' and in many instances it has been
proved that the code produced by GCC is indeed
compact. So why not use 'C' for FP. It will also be
lot more easier to maintain the code.

Nayani



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. 
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250