[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized
From: |
Nathan Moore |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:25:52 -0500 |
Thank you for your explination Bjoern.
I have looked at GCC internals before, but never worked on them, so I'm
likely to say something stupid.
I would have thought that an optimization pattern for just this type of
thing would have already been in GCC, especially since on the internal
helper function is not unlike the divide instruction on x86, returning 2
values rather than one. I would think that peephole optimization would
be all over this.
Nathan
-----Original Message-----
From: Haase Bjoern (PT/EMM1) [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:16 AM
To: Nathan Moore; address@hidden
Subject: AW: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized
The source of this problem is a deeply buried internal issue of the RTL
handling within the compiler.
Description of the internal problem:
The expand pass generates strange RTL sequences refering to hard
registers for the div and mod operations and uses specific insn RTL for
calling the respective functions. This way the compiler does not need to
save and restore all of the call-clobbered registers but only those that
the functions alter.
Unfortunately div and mod could not be optimized this way because the
combine and CSE passes do not operate on hard registers :-(.
Unfortunately there is no easy solution of this issue :-(.
- [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Nathan Moore, 2007/12/11
- AW: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Haase Bjoern (PT/EMM1), 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Albert Andras, 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Gre7g Luterman, 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Paulo Marques, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Paulo Marques, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Gre7g Luterman, 2007/12/12